Find me some libertarians who think the dope and condoms should be given to them for free. That would be an intellectually inconsistent position on their part. Many or even most libertarians would say that they should be allowed to purchase those things, should they want them, but a claim that they should be provided for “free” seems to be outside of libertarian philosophy, at least so far as it it generally understood. Within the context of my discussion with the other poster, your comment #129 made no sense at all.
You have once again evaded the question. More of your words.
“you are at freerepublic trying to persuade conservatives to move left, and embrace social liberalism.”
Proof, please. Give one example where I argued against social conservatism, or embraced social liberalism. Just one of either. I don’t argue against social conservatism, I argue with you.
So name one of these socially liberal positions I support. Come on, ansel12, just name one.
You are just starting it all over again, pretending that the argument is about who pays for the drugs, and ignoring post 129 and Rand Paul on social issues.
You are saying now that you oppose the libertarian position on social issues and support the conservatives?