“Hmmmm, with your password, a government agent could use your account to establish a search history of any sort they may so desire.
In court they could make you look like any sort of monster that fits a narrative.”
If this is proven to be true, it sounds to me like “reasonable doubt” should not be very difficult to demonstrate to a jury. As a defense attorney, I would subpoena the government, and, of course, they won’t cooperate.
This should be interesting. What would have been a “tin foil hat” defense isn’t so funny now, is it?
I've never worried about anything I've done, but when younger used to stay awake nights wondering what I would do if ever asked, "where were you the evening of March 12, 1989, between the hours of 11 pm and 3 am?
If my life depended on it, I would be unable to answer correctly.
When the government itself manufactures reasonable doubt for me, I consider that an improvement.