Yes, the unbiased would have cut out all the superfluous nonsense if they know the law. They would not even consider all side-tracking done by the prosecution or by the biased judge.
Zimmerman got out of the car - irrelevant.
Zimmerman was said that he "followed" him - irrelevant.
Zimmerman's injury wasn't "serious", said prosecuting ME witness - irrelevant.
Attempts to paint Zimmerman as a racist - irrelevant.
All of it irrelevant. And so on and so on...
It all came down to the actions of both men in last 45 seconds or so until the shot was fired resulting in the death of Martin.
Two pertinent questions that had to be answered:
Question: did Martin physically attack Zimmerman that was serious enough that Zimmerman felt that his life was at risk or serious bodily harm?
Answer: yes
Question: did Zimmerman act in self-defense in accordance with the law?
Answer: yes.
Verdict: not guilty of murder 2 or manslaughter.
A jury who knows the law could have been in and out of jury room to give their verdict of not guilty within 5 minutes. Case closed and in time to go home for dinner.
Correct. The forensics of the bullet also supported that St Skittles was on top and that the bullet went through both lungs.