Obviouly It’s a good time to be a criminal in this day age...
*sigh* When does the shooting start again?
if ANYTHING happens to this girl the judge should be thrown in prison for INTENTIONALLY ENDANGERING that child- Hell- Child progtective services shoudl be called to investigate3 that judge
A detailed account. It’s very ugly.
A detailed account. It’s very ugly.
I’m confused. If the victim was six when it happened, and it happened “six years ago”, wouldn’t she be 12 now?
this is horrific....let alone taking a girl child away from her mother and handing her over to a perverted rapist father.....
run woman...take the child with you....hide til she's 18 then let what will be, be...
run....RUN!
Something is very, very wrong here.
Understand this reasoning, cause here it comes:
1. Parents do many things out of love for their children which the children dislike. Doctor’s shots. Eating brocolli.
2. Children are by law unable to give or refuse legal consent. The child can give no legal consent or refusal to eating broccoli, and the parent has the right to make the child eat broccoli.
3. All stops on the wide spectrum of human sexuality are good. Or rather, there is no stop on the spectrum of human sexuality deserving admonishment or condemnation.
4. A father engaging in sexual activity with his six year old daughter is not offensive. The child may in fact enjoy it. Even if the child doesn’t enjoy it, the parent retains the right and obligation to act in loving ways with the child. Sex-offender laws and labels are wrong.
This article is completely confusing. Is this daughter the same daughter he raped? I can hardly believe he’d regain custody in those circumstances. What about the half-brother? It sounds like the person took all of 5 minutes to write this short piece, which raises only more questions in my mind.
The child whom Mr. Elizondo was convicted of molesting was NOT Ms. Knight’s daughter, Sarah, but his daughter from a previous relationship. Ms. Knight and Mr. Elizondo separated before Sarah, now 6 years old, was born.
Mr. Elizondo claims he is innocent of the original charged, and that Ms. Knight fabricated an additional charge that young Sarah, while visiting him, was molested by his 19-year-old son from a previous relationship.
He must have promised to share the little girl with the judge. The judge has to either be a perv himself or was bribed.
Lisa Knight is a freaking freak pro-create with a convicted sex pervert. He’s probably really porn hot...not. What are the odds that a slut will get knocked up by a convict sex pervert? Lisa slut hit the jack pot. Maybe he had aids and the crabs, too?