[rollo tomasi]

Do you actually favor expanding the Feds definition of “marriage”? You are the hypocrite or closet pervert. DOMA was a firewall of law in which the Federal government already established the recognition of matrimony through various laws and the 16th via the powers granted to Congress (Tax code). DOMA just protected that definition, not created the Feds recognition of matrimony. The reality of a Constitution on life-support was shattered during the Progressive Era. Now we have mob rule and expansions favored by convoluted libertarians.

[i_robot73]

Expand? I’m in favor of getting gov’t (Fed AND State) OUT of the marriage business; it’s got NO right nor authority to a Free people.

DOMA was, and is, yet another Fed. intrusion in what is outside the Fed. mandate to define/enforce...much as 95% of the current ‘Laws’ on the books.

You’re own admission is a such...social engineering per the tax code; above and beyond the 9th and 10th. Still, all, Unconstitutional. Glad to know you know me from Adam enough to cast the ‘net of speculation.

‘Bout the only thing I’d agree with is your statement that the Founding docs are on life support, and we are not ruled by an oligarchy.

Guess I should pinch my nose and vote foe the (R) in ‘14 too, eh? /s