[Rational Thought]

The only conclusion I have as to the motives of both political parties is to insure that government has complete, unchecked control. I have suspected for a long time that the hierarchy of both parties truly want a socialist state. That being the case, the underlying objective supersedes which party is in power.

As I believe this writers’ estimation of the numbers we’re dealing with (”20 to 30 million or more”), where stupidity comes into play is how the government can handle an increase of this magnitude to those on government assistance? Answer, it can’t.

[Lakeshark]

The one side wants chaos for dictatorship, the other side is simply holding their clothes while they watch the stoning.........

Sickening and stupid, the Bobssey twins.

Don't get me wrong, there are a few that are holding strong, and we need to support them.

[Walrus]

There is a “dirty little secret” lurking here, one which -—if admitted publicly -— would cause tremendous upheaval.

More workers are needed here to support our massive government expenditures. The welfare queens and their hit-and-run boyfriends simply will not work. They may be lazy, but they’re not stupid. Why in the world would you take a pay cut in order to spend eight hours a day away from your snack cupboard and your flatscreen TV?

On the other hand, Hispanic immigrants have historically shown a good deal of industry, most often by doing work that is “beneath” the lazy Americans... but work that still needs to be done by SOMEONE.

If masses of Hispanic immigrants (the obvious target of the immigration bills) are legitimized, not only will the workforce numbers be vastly increased, but -—more importantly -— most of them will be “on the books” and be subject to tax witholding. And the number of people contributing to social security will rise back up to levels needed to sustain the program.

Does this sound like a “win-win” for Marco Rubio, whose constituency is primarily retirees and Hispanics?