Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This Decision may not be all bad. States just must follow the guidelines.....
1 posted on 06/18/2013 7:39:27 AM PDT by EXCH54FE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EXCH54FE

No, it’s bad.


2 posted on 06/18/2013 7:42:01 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
Saw this last night. Hope that it's true since I was really scratching my head about Scalia with this opinion.

Left Loses Big in Citizenship-Verification Supreme Court Case

3 posted on 06/18/2013 7:45:15 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

If I understand what this article says, people can register to vote using the federal form and lie about their citizenship (or can register in the names of other people altogether). Then they can vote absentee, as an increasing number of voters do, and there is no way to check their eligibility.

It sounds like it is really bad.


4 posted on 06/18/2013 7:51:25 AM PDT by Piranha (We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
It sounds like the Federal law regarding registration makes a HUGE assumption that people are honest when they state they are a US citizen on the registration form.

I don't think the government has the resources or the will to follow through with investigating those who are not honest.

6 posted on 06/18/2013 8:07:32 AM PDT by bubbacluck (You don't drive out the darkness; you turn on the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

So basically the Federal form says are you a US citizen and you say “Si”. :-)


9 posted on 06/18/2013 8:27:22 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
So it is okay for the NSA to vacuum up the data on a billion telephone calls a day even though they possess no information that establishes the possible criminal activity of the communicants.

They don't even have to have a suspicion - they can legally just go on a fishing expedition with no 4th amendment protection requiring probable cause.

But the state cannot require someone to prove they are legally eligible to vote before they can register to vote. So even illegals can register to vote as long as they are willing to lie and can fill in the registration form with realistic sounding information.

From the article:

"The Court ruled the way it did because there is already a federal law requiring people to affirm that they are U.S. citizens when they register to vote."

There are also laws against crossing into the US illegally and living here illegally but that hasn't stopped somewhere between 11 million and 35 million illegals from doing just that.

So the legal protection to maintain the integrity of the voting process is essentially an "honor system" - illegals can register without having to prove they are eligible.

Once they are registered to vote they can be required to provide ID to prove they are the person who previously registered to vote, even though that person may not actually be legally eligible to vote.

So the state can only challenge a voter if it appears they are not the person previously registered, but the state can not require proof of eligibility to vote except as follows:.

"The Court specifically noted that under our Constitution, states have the exclusive right to determine the qualifications of voters in federal elections, and Arizona can deny registration to anyone who submits a federal form if it has other information in its possession that establishes the ineligibility of the applicant.".

Rather than protecting the integrity of the voting system it appears the Supreme Court is more interested in maintaining a process designed to make it easy for an illegal to register and difficult for the state to challenge their eligibility.


11 posted on 06/18/2013 8:29:17 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Obama-Ville - Land of The Free Stuff, Home of the Enslaved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

This is the clearest explanation I have seen. My question what is the recourse within a state when a person affirms on the federal form to be a citizen and they are not? With the case in Indiana where the woman is going to jail, the damage is already done.


13 posted on 06/18/2013 9:00:22 AM PDT by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
This Decision may not be all bad. States just must follow the guidelines.....

So much for states' right. Another win for the expanding federal government.
16 posted on 06/18/2013 10:05:23 AM PDT by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson