Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 0.E.O

If the central government was indeed oppressive then the South played a large part in making it so. And replaced it with their own oppressive central government once they rebelled.

///////////////
Whatever the case, I think we can both agree that secession would not have been seen as a viable option if the Southern states felt that the Central Government was responsive to their concerns.


116 posted on 06/16/2013 12:58:26 PM PDT by man_in_tx (Blowback (Faithfully farting twowards Mecca five times daily).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: man_in_tx
Whatever the case, I think we can both agree that secession would not have been seen as a viable option if the Southern states felt that the Central Government was responsive to their concerns.

How was it not?

118 posted on 06/16/2013 1:00:58 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: man_in_tx
Whatever the case, I think we can both agree that secession would not have been seen as a viable option if the Southern states felt that the Central Government was responsive to their concerns.

Wrong again.

the slavers were the Central Government! The slavrocrisy wasn't satisfied with controlling the government - which they had for most of its then 70 years. At a time when slavery was losing its viability in most of the rest of the world the slavers insisted on expanding their interests and to hell with any other opinion.

The slavers had a temper tantrum when Lincoln was elected and acted like democrats always act - boorish fools.

123 posted on 06/16/2013 1:13:36 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson