Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GSD Lover; BykrBayb

All age of consent laws involve a situation wherein “The laws are stupid. It’s legal one day, and not legal the next.”

So you must be against all age of consent laws, as long as the kid is old enough to list “yes”, I guess.

You write like a chicken hawk.


148 posted on 05/20/2013 2:15:14 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

Yeah, there’s a couple of them promoting the idea that homosexual molestation of children should be legal and socially accepted, but calling it what is is should be forbidden.


151 posted on 05/20/2013 2:20:05 PM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

No, I’m for an absolute age difference as in 4 years (4 X 365 days) or 3 years (3 X 365 days) - not just a cutoff once one hits a birthday. I think laws that make Romeo and Juliet romances legal one day and illegal the next are stupid. Some states write their Romeo and Juliet laws to reflect reality.


155 posted on 05/20/2013 2:29:07 PM PDT by GSD Lover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

By the way, most age of consent laws are not stupidly written.

It’s is illegal to drink before you turn a certain age. It is illegal to drive before a certain age. Etc.

But some Romeo and Juliet laws are written so that it is legal to have sex with Juliet one day, but not the next.

And I’m definitely no chickenhawk.


156 posted on 05/20/2013 2:32:21 PM PDT by GSD Lover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson