Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/13/2013 7:14:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obama is the Prince of Fools. It is the fools that support this ongoing plan for ‘Change’ that I have a problem with. Obama will be out of office in a few years, but they linger on and on and on.


2 posted on 05/13/2013 7:18:25 PM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Impeachment File on Benghazi Coward B. Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, a legal citizen of the sovereign Nation of Indonesia.


5 posted on 05/13/2013 7:36:23 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
his Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof

Yhe problem here is that Congress and this president are passing laws that are manifestly NOT "in pursuance thereof."

7 posted on 05/13/2013 7:48:34 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"A divided Supreme Court gave it a pass, calling it a tax, "

BS

Traitor Roberts, on his own, found a lame way to approve it while claiming it was the will of the people.

Roberts needs to be impeached first (even if it is for perverting adoption laws - national and international).

8 posted on 05/13/2013 7:58:49 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Alan Caruba can’t read his own quotes.

There are 6 critical words of the supremacy clause which form the foundation of nullification. Those words are: “which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;”

No matter what the Federal employees in black robes said Obama care is quite obviously NOT made in pursuance of the federal constitution. There is no clause in that 11 page document that even mentions healthcare much-less the government’s right to force us to buy a private good or service.

Nullification is not an act of veto, less it be called a veto. Nullification is in fact exactly what the Federal magistrates do in respect to some law that come before them unauthorized by the Federal constitution.

In Madison vs Maybury the first chief justice of the court explained this in laying our his power & responsibility to declare null an act unauthorized by the Constitution. He said this power is derived from their oath to uphold the Federal Constitution. Is that not the exact same oath our State leglsators take? Is not that oath utterly meaningless if we are to tell all those who are sworn to uphold it to simply do whatever they are told by those limited by that constitution?

A constitution written to limit the power of government cannot be upheld by failing to appose usurpation by that same government, just as it cannot be enforced exclusively by the same people it binds.

This is nullification and this is why it MUST be successful if we are to survive as a free country under ANY constitution. The Federal Constitution was written and empowered by the States for the propose of establishing and most importantly binding a limited Federal Government.


9 posted on 05/13/2013 8:08:35 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The difference between Prohibition and Obamacare is that in it’s initialization Obamacare will destroy the world class US medical profession. It will be difficult to rebuild with out great disruption of service.


11 posted on 05/13/2013 8:19:49 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (A Strong Man Armed who guards his home, lives in peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson