Replies

To: null and void; huldah1776; kabumpo; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; smvoice; ...

At that point, a sane society only has the option of recognizing that this is a case where the criminal MUST be eliminated.

Some would argue this has a larger application (not really)

Why should a brain defect give a man the right to again run free and murder another?

The problem is there is probability but not absolute proof: the researcher himself had a brain close to murderers, and the power this gives to murderous governments is too great. As in the Bible, evidence 2 or 3 eyewitness for capital crimes , with false witnesses receiving the penalty their false testimony incurred), we must wait till the crime occurred.

46 posted on 05/12/2013 4:21:22 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)

I made that precise point in my first paragraph.

Then I hammered it home again in my last paragraph.

Was I not clear?

One must have the predisposing factors AND HAVE ACTED ON THEM to earn permanent removal from society.

49 posted on 05/12/2013 4:36:50 PM PDT by null and void (The motto of all liberals is "With your guilt and your gelt we can get away with anything!")

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794