Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HawkHogan

Hawk, that’s bunk.

The Founders made a distinction between the requirements for senators and representatives (citizens) and president and vice-president (natural born citizen). They did this for a very distinct and important reason—to prevent someone with dual or duplicitous loyalties from assuming the office of president.

If you or anyone else doesn’t like the Constitution, convene a convention and change it (which would be a very, very bad idea). It says what it says, and natural born citizen means the same thing now as it did when the Founders wrote it in our Constitution, regardless of how many people choose to ignore, deny or pervert its meaning.


35 posted on 05/09/2013 8:26:09 PM PDT by WXRGina (The Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: WXRGina

No. It’s not bunk. Not one constitutional scholar or lawyer subscribes to that definition. In fact, no one outside the birther movement believes that definition.


57 posted on 05/09/2013 10:04:47 PM PDT by HawkHogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: WXRGina

Let’s list the types of citizens:

1. Natural-born.
2. Naturalized.
3. ???

Please help complete the list, and let me know where the third one is found in the Constitution.


72 posted on 05/10/2013 7:05:27 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Oppression -> Extermination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson