Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California seems likely to ban fracking
Quarz ^ | May 7, 2013 | Todd Woody

Posted on 05/08/2013 11:23:37 AM PDT by thackney

Have environmentalists already won the war over fracking in California?

It’s starting to look that way. A trio of bills swiftly moving through the state’s legislature would ban hydraulic fracturing, also called fracking, until the practice is deemed safe.

The bills are among nine pieces of legislation currently under consideration that would effectively restrict drilling in the Monterey Shale, a geological formation that holds an estimated 15.4 billion barrels of oil, the largest such reserve in the US. Unreachable by conventional drilling, the Monterey Shale has come into play with advances in fracking, which injects chemical-laced water into wells under high pressure to fracture rock formations so oil and gas can be extracted.

California may be home to a burgeoning green technology industry, but it is also the US’s fourth-largest oil producer. And although the state has passed the nations’ strictest environmental laws, fracking, strangely, remains largely unregulated.

Not for much longer. Aside from the raft of legislation, the state agency that regulates oil and gas drilling is moving to adopt new regulations that would require oil and gas companies to notify authorities before they begin drilling and disclose the location of wells and chemicals used in fracking fluid. In March, southern California air quality regulators required drillers to make similar disclosures and report any air pollutants emitted during fracking.

The oil and gas industry suffered a further setback in April when a federal judge ruled that the US Bureau of Land Management illegally approved leases for drilling on government-owned land in California without properly considering the potential environmental impacts of fracking.

An oil industry trade group voluntarily reported to the state that 27% of the 2,300 new wells drilled California in 2011 involved fracking.

The bills now making its way through the state legislature would impose some of the strictest regulations on fracking. Attention is focused on Senate Bill 4 (SB4), introduced by state senator Fran Pavley, who co-authored California’s landmark 2006 global warming law.

SB4 would bar the issuance of drilling permits until a scientific study on the environmental impacts of fracking is completed. People who live near fracking operations could request that regulators test well water to ensure drilling has not contaminated drinking water.

As concerns grow that fracking may exacerbate water shortages—California faces dry times due to declining snow packs—another bill, AB649, would ban the use of fresh water in fracking and prohibit drilling near aquifers. AB1323 would ban fracking “until a study shows how it can be done safely.”

The oil and gas industry argues the bills would end the fracking boom before it has even begun. “This would unnecessarily and substantially threaten our supplies of oil and natural gas, raising business costs and harming California’s economy,” the Western States Petroleum Association said in comments submitted in opposition to the legislation.

Last year the industry managed to derail similar legislation. But the political landscape looks much different in 2013. Democrats now hold a supermajority in the legislature. And while governor Jerry Brown, a Democrat, has expressed support for the responsible development of shale oil and gas reserves, his legislative colleagues hold the votes to override a veto of anti-fracking bills.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ban; energy; fracking; kalifornia; oil; shale
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 05/08/2013 11:23:37 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

The benefit from the lower prices of fungible gas and oil but refuse to help contribute to lowering the cost.

Too bad we can’t do anything about it either.


2 posted on 05/08/2013 11:26:20 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

foolish people the Californians!!


3 posted on 05/08/2013 11:26:27 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“California seems likely to ban fracking”

Unless it’s GAY fracking...


4 posted on 05/08/2013 11:26:29 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Let them swelter in the dark.


5 posted on 05/08/2013 11:28:36 AM PDT by LOC1 (Let's pick the best, not settle for a compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
foolish people the Californians!!

Really! I refuse to feel sorry for anyone in CA since they are the ones, thru their voting, who have placed themselves in this position. Businesses are fleeing the state; yet, they refuse to help themselves.

6 posted on 05/08/2013 11:29:33 AM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

But if California bans gay marriage — which we all know is MORE important than being energy self-reliant — the Supreme Court intervenes.


7 posted on 05/08/2013 11:30:01 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I live in CA. This state is rapidly becoming a third world country due to lack of funding for basic stuff like roads and primary education, and Sacramento is wondering if California should frack the Monterey Shale? Or even resume drilling off Santa Barbara? The Central Valley and other Red counties need to secede from CA.


8 posted on 05/08/2013 11:34:45 AM PDT by Gluteus Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

California ‘Rats = stupidity on steroids.


9 posted on 05/08/2013 11:35:39 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers
Democrat Useful Idiots


Click The Pic To Donate

Support Common Sense, Donate To FR

10 posted on 05/08/2013 11:40:55 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Ban the importation of any “fracked” products INTO California.


11 posted on 05/08/2013 11:41:00 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Ban, Tax & Censor, it’s the liberal way.


12 posted on 05/08/2013 11:42:45 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Its California that is fracked. Damn stupid communists inspired Democrats in Sacrament are so corrupt this State is finished.
13 posted on 05/08/2013 11:43:39 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areukiddingme1

that’s Matt Damon approved.


14 posted on 05/08/2013 11:43:42 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Texans better start preparing for more Californians to move to the state.


15 posted on 05/08/2013 11:43:58 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
In that case, they really ought to ban oil or gas produced from fracking elsewhere in the world too.

I wonder how the firewood supply is in California?

16 posted on 05/08/2013 11:44:20 AM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LOC1
Yup. A few “Jerry Brown-outs” like a few years ago will bring them back to the real world. Then again, many of them probably don't use toilet paper because it is bad for the environment so the lights flickering on and off probably won't bother them.
17 posted on 05/08/2013 11:45:14 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Morons. Fracking has been taking place in this country since the early 40’s and there has never been one documented instance of any issue that was portrayed in that stupid anti-fracking movie. Yet the immature, idiotic, morons on the left seem to think that the made up crap in movies is real.

I hope the surrounding states cut them off from the cheap natural gas that results from fracking.


18 posted on 05/08/2013 11:47:14 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gluteus Maximus

California has a bunch of hypocrites who expect cheap water and cheap electric power brought in from neighbor states. Banning fracking means other states which allow it will again bear the burden of producing cheap energy that California will benefit from as fracking is making US oil and gas plentiful and less expensive.

The smug liberals also reject the boon of production royalties and more local jobs, yet will still expect out state taxpayers to pay federal taxes which CA senators and congress critters will seek to divert to CA.


19 posted on 05/08/2013 11:48:33 AM PDT by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Typical parasite leftist California. Just like their electric utility policy. It’s based on the premise that electricity should be produced “somewhere else” and magically delivered in unlimited quantities to their outlets at no cost. If there is a high cost, its due to “greedy corporations.” They apply that philosophy to all their energy policy.


20 posted on 05/08/2013 11:57:30 AM PDT by henkster (I have one more cow than my neighbor. I am a kulak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson