Out-of-town billionaires want to buy the Dodgers? Really? When? They might play a whole lot better than they are now. A really good idea.
1 posted on
05/01/2013 9:02:18 AM PDT by
Nachum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: Nachum
a good newspaper is a far more valuable asset. And it's too bad America's 2nd largest metro area doesn't have one.
2 posted on
05/01/2013 9:03:20 AM PDT by
relictele
To: Nachum
Right now the LAT is the Obamadork’s butt-kissing toilet, with the intellectual integrity of a senator.
Methinks megaphone might be an improvement.
3 posted on
05/01/2013 9:03:34 AM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: Nachum
Well, Karl Marx owns the megaphone now.
4 posted on
05/01/2013 9:04:17 AM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: Nachum
“The people of Los Angeles would be up in arms if some out-of-town billionaires tried to buy the Dodgers and institute a rule that only right-handers could play on the team. Petitions would be signed, protests would be organized and politicians would rise up to condemn the sale.”
And, even with all that, it wouldn’t stop the sale.
Liberals just hate when they can’t control things..
Also sounds like ‘Dave’ is a little worried about losing his job.
If he keeps going the way he is, he just might be right.
5 posted on
05/01/2013 9:05:19 AM PDT by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to being a liberal)
To: Nachum
The people of Los Angeles would be up in arms if some out-of-town billionaires tried to buy the Dodgers.
Yeah Imagine that.
6 posted on
05/01/2013 9:05:58 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Nachum
"I'm David Horsey, and I wrote this message!"
7 posted on
05/01/2013 9:06:31 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Nachum
a good newspaper is a far more valuable assetYup. It's a shame that LA doesn't have one unless "Democrat Party shills" qualifies...
9 posted on
05/01/2013 9:08:45 AM PDT by
piytar
(The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
To: Nachum
Check out
this bizarre editorial in HuffPo. The writer uses various fantasies and unsupported anecdotes to say that half the LAT staff is going to quit if the Koch deal goes through. I'll bet half the LAT staff has no idea who the Koch brothers are.
10 posted on
05/01/2013 9:09:09 AM PDT by
Baynative
(Lord, keep your arm around my shoulder and your hand over my mouth.)
To: Nachum
So, when are they going to get a good newspaper? LMAO
To: Nachum
Does he mean that after they buy it I might actually would want to read anything there more than my current once every two years? Have they no shame?
12 posted on
05/01/2013 9:10:34 AM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
To: Nachum
Actually, the Kochs have a big advantage here.
Newspapers are of most interest to people who know how to read, do so in English, and actually care to read.
That rules about 60% of the current LA population.
13 posted on
05/01/2013 9:11:19 AM PDT by
rdcbn
To: Nachum
a good newspaper is a far more valuable asset.Define "good".
14 posted on
05/01/2013 9:11:28 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: Nachum
Leftists are such incessant whiners.
17 posted on
05/01/2013 9:14:25 AM PDT by
chrisser
(Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
To: Nachum
Koch brothers want to make your newspaper their megaphone I say, "BRING IT ON BOYS."
Against this communistic media we could use a little more fire power in getting information, that should be reported and isn't, out to the public.
To: Nachum
Because America hating socialists aren't using the paper (and almost all of media) as their megaphone?
19 posted on
05/01/2013 9:15:48 AM PDT by
Vision
(We are not descended from fearful men)
To: Nachum
All along, the liberals would have had us believe that it doesn’t really matter who owns a media outlet, because newsroom integrity and the quality of reporting would never be affected by left-wing ownership.
Now they are asking us to believe the exact opposite. They are running scared at the LA Times. Good. The comfortable are becoming afflicted.
20 posted on
05/01/2013 9:15:52 AM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
(Blather. Reince. Repeat.)
To: Nachum
Newspapers are withering away all over the country. Right and left.
They may be billionaires now but it doesn’t seem like they want to stay that way.
24 posted on
05/01/2013 9:21:11 AM PDT by
toast
To: Nachum
The people of Los Angeles would be up in arms if some out-of-town billionaires tried to buy the Rams and move them out of town, leaving L.A. without an NFL team for more than a decade.
Oh, wait...
To: Nachum
It’s why they call the Dodgers they thing the game is dodge ball.
27 posted on
05/01/2013 9:27:19 AM PDT by
Vaduz
To: Nachum
Obviously Horsey is quite comfortable with the current “balance of power” in the media world right now of 98% liberal, vs. 2% other-than-liberal.
Having the Koch brothers buy the L.A. Times would be akin to the tragedy of Jason Collins breaking a nail during his next NBA game.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson