Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76
It's not illegal to "radicalize" someone now, is it?

Ultimately the person radicalized is responsible for their actions.

42 posted on 04/28/2013 9:02:28 AM PDT by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: riri
It's not illegal to "radicalize" someone now, is it?

Ultimately the person radicalized is responsible for their actions.

Precisely. In a world where Trust isn't just a name on a bank, we could be certain the federal authorities would identify Red Beard as "a person of interest" from whom is required "assistance with certain inquiries."

Their sole interest would be information and certainly to spy out this person's culpability, if any.

Instead, there are multiple credible sources citing this character and relating him to at least three story lines, including one questioning his existence.

The credibility of the FBI used to be a concern generally held by everyone, with good reason. It's clearly now hardly a secondary concern, by some, and a Modus operandi of this administration's culture.

Yes, indeed, the Nuremberg Defense should not apply, ever. Its being suggested, even as a subtext, is not a hopeful sign.

59 posted on 04/28/2013 9:45:46 AM PDT by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson