Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OKRA2012
Should we treat the Boston Bomber harsher than James Holmes or Jared Lee Loughner?

How harshly is it even possible to treat someone? Especially when they're already dead. That's not the point. The point is the clear difference in the nature of these acts. The three "shooters" were acting out personal fantasies of some kind, and in this sense their acts were "crazy", that is done only to gratify the impulse, and with no idea of anything to follow.

The Boston bombers acted in concert, and walked away from the scene anonymously, resuming their innocuous seeming activities. They planned to do more, but were foiled by the video that ID'd them, which represents a miscalculation on their part. I say it was terrorism if there is such a thing, and there is.

74 posted on 04/23/2013 7:13:24 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: dr_lew

“How harshly is it even possible to treat someone? Especially when they’re already dead. That’s not the point. The point is the clear difference in the nature of these acts. The three “shooters” were acting out personal fantasies of some kind, and in this sense their acts were “crazy”, that is done only to gratify the impulse, and with no idea of anything to follow.”

James Holmes and Jared Lee Loughner are very much alive.

And neither of the above mentioned shooters or the Columbine killers or Adam Lanza acted on impulse. Each of their attacks were methodically planned and we have no idea what they would have done if they had walked away and had to be hunted down.


86 posted on 04/23/2013 7:20:06 PM PDT by OKRA2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson