“No. At this point it becomes a legal, not medical matter.”
In this case, the parents where under community supervision (probation) which as is a legal matter. And by refusing to seek medical attention for the second child, they violated the terms of their probation.
Therefore, this case is a legal matter.
Do you still believe that these parents were acting within their rights by not seeking medical attention for their child?
Do you still believe that these parents were acting within their rights by not seeking medical attention for their child?
So they were acting within their God given rights, but the state limits those rights. The real question may be, what God given parental rights does the state have the constitutional authority to limit? And everyone has a different opinion on that one. I think most of us here think this pair crossed the line.