Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bushbacker1

So, in spite of Supreme Court decisions requiring the reading of Miranda rights, you do not believe that this should have been done in this case? How do you think a failure to do so would have affected future court actions? What would you recommend that they do in these circumstances?


69 posted on 04/19/2013 7:47:14 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: centurion316
"So, in spite of Supreme Court decisions requiring the reading of Miranda rights, you do not believe that this should have been done in this case? How do you think a failure to do so would have affected future court actions? What would you recommend that they do in these circumstances?"

Miranda is not required to ask this guy a number of questions about imminent dangers to the public.

74 posted on 04/19/2013 7:48:54 PM PDT by 101stAirborneVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316
So, in spite of Supreme Court decisions requiring the reading of Miranda rights,

Are enemy combatants and traitors entitled to Miranda rights?

77 posted on 04/19/2013 7:51:24 PM PDT by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316
What would you recommend that they do in these circumstances?

I repeat: They should have taken him to a black site and water boarded him!

Thank you for your support! /S

84 posted on 04/19/2013 7:54:14 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson