Looks like PUFFY guy is wearing GLOVES too!
Jesus, while the crowd is wearing “shirts and jackets,” PUFFY guy is wearing...
HAT
SUNGLASSES
ARCTIC-WEIGHT COAT
GLOVES
If PUFFY guy isn’t suspicious, I don’t know who is.
Can anybody find the “PHOTOS” that Shoebat mentions during THIS radio interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKmXHhOG9AM
Shoebat keeps saying “Asia Times posted photos of 3 Saudis hanging around near the finish line. They’re definitely Saudis b/c I know what Saudis look like. And what are Saudi students doing with a BABY STROLLER anyway?”
I keep searching the web, and cannot find the photos he’s referring to. I want to see what these Saudis with baby stroller look like.
They could easily have concealed the “pressure cooker” bomb in the stroller.
RE: Gloves
I thought about that, and I’m sure that could be why there seems to be no visible hand, but I still don’t see much of an arm coming out of the end of the sleeve, unless it is real thin and covered in dark material.
Photo’s, and particularly fuzzy blow-ups like these can be tricky to analyze. Maybe the guy has a thyroid problem and bundles up when it’s warm, and maybe there is a plausible reason the arm looks odd. It is particularly of interest since it seems to have been close to the blast site, at least according to the hotair blog.
Someone else posted the question, what about the trash can location of the bomb? If hotair has the location right, there does not seem to be a trash can there.
With the almost blackout of facts coming through the media I don’t expect any resolution of this for a long time - and probably much of it will go the way of Benghazi.
You know, if they are NOT the bombers, and there really was a baby in that stroller, they are very close to the site of the blast, and a baby would presumably have been hurt. Now, babies being hurt usually makes the news. Small victims make good headlines, but the youngest victim I’ve heard of is the 8 year old boy who was very, very close in one picture I saw.
ping