Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bipartisan deal reached on gun background checks
Washington Post ^ | 04/10/2013 | Ed O'Keefe

Posted on 04/10/2013 7:39:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: unixfox

How bout IGNORE IT. They can make all the phony laws they want. Then try to enforce them!

That may sound like a good idea, but that would be last resort IMHO. Far better to have some distance between bad law and last resort.


61 posted on 04/10/2013 8:30:33 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Toomey’s a TRAITOR. He’s let the snakes in the back door.


62 posted on 04/10/2013 8:31:02 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (The most insidious power the news media has, is the power to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

WASHINGTON, D.C. —

A Senate aide and a lobbyist say two senators have struck a bipartisan deal on expanding background checks to more firearms purchases. The agreement could build support for President Barack Obama’s drive to curb gun violence.

http://www.sj-r.com/breaking/x1431006472/Dem-GOP-U-S-senators-reach-gun-background-check-deal


63 posted on 04/10/2013 8:32:18 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Remember Obmma Care? The same was said about that.

All they need to do is roll 16 Repubs. They can do that.


64 posted on 04/10/2013 8:34:03 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

RE: The agreement could build support for President Barack Obama’s drive to curb gun violence.

That’s the argument... the more important question is this -— WILL IT?


65 posted on 04/10/2013 8:34:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Andrew Malcolm
Political News & Commentary
Obama continues his traveling gun show charade

By Andrew Malcolm

Posted 04/09/2013 09:06 AM ET

President Obama was on again Monday about gun laws, not enforcing the existing ones. But getting some new ones, any new ones so he can claim some kind of political victory after all of the promises and vows he made in the emotional days last December.

But Obama wasn’t working on the senators from his own party who will actually determine the fate of these measures. That would be political leadership.

No, Obama was out of town again, up in Hartford for a photo op with Connecticut legislators and some Newtown families. Of course, it wasn’t so much about everyone coming together to agree on new safeguards to protect children anymore, as he talked way back in December. No, as usual, this latest campaign rally was all about him. The usual suspects yelled their love. Obama mentioned himself 40 times.

Read More At Investor’s Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/politics-andrew-malcolm/040913-651148-obama-senate-background-check-legislation.htm#ixzz2Q4iTMKJp
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook


66 posted on 04/10/2013 8:34:23 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
The agreement could build support for President Barack Obama’s drive to curb gun violence.

D.C. forgot to add ... No Criminals will be emboldened by this legislation.

67 posted on 04/10/2013 8:35:26 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

April 10, 2013 4:00 A.M.

A Tax on Freedom
Punitive taxes on guns and ammunition will punish only the law-abiding.

By Charles C. W. Cooke

‘I’m not asking to take away people’s guns,” Maryland legislator Jon Cardin nervously told Politico this week. “I’m just saying that for an activity that is relatively dangerous, obviously, people who participate in that activity should pay the full costs of that activity.” America, witness a guileful new tactic of the gun-control movement.

Cardin (a nephew of U.S. Senator Ben Cardin, a Maryland Democrat), who wishes “to tax bullets at 50 percent,” was outlining an increasingly popular progressive idea: If you can’t regulate something, why not tax it in lieu? Similar proposals — by which states impose specific levies on purchases of firearms and assorted peripheral items — are now being considered in California, Nevada, and New Jersey; and in Chicago,

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/345160/tax-freedom-charles-c-w-cooke


68 posted on 04/10/2013 8:38:13 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

F’ing RINOs.


69 posted on 04/10/2013 8:40:06 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Due Process 2013: "Burn the M*****-F***er Down!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wita

Ok, so where do YOU draw the line?


70 posted on 04/10/2013 8:41:49 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Just how, and where, can you buy a gun over the internet? You can’t.


Depends on how you define your terms.

You can see an advertisement for a gun, contact the seller, and come to terms. You then buy it from the seller, legally, without a background check.

This is legal in many states, and legal under federal law as long as the transaction is within the state.


71 posted on 04/10/2013 8:48:37 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Oppression -> Extermination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
From the Gun Broker site:

You do not have to be a licensed dealer to buy a firearm. If you are not a licensed firearm dealer (also called an FFL Holder), you must make arrangements with an FFL Holder in your state to receive the item and transfer it to you. Virtually anyone who is involved in the sale or distribution of firearms is an FFL Holder, including gun shops. You must make arrangements with your FFL Holder before placing a bid on an item. By contacting the FFL Holder before bidding, the buyer can verify that all state and federal laws will be observed. For most firearms, the buyer must be able to pass a background check.

So technically you can buy it, but an FFL is still involved, so the checks and balances are there.

72 posted on 04/10/2013 8:55:47 AM PDT by 5 Second Rule (I'm not talking about my food. I'm talking about my dates...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Something off topic .... am curious about your date attachment. Did something clue you in ... two days before?


73 posted on 04/10/2013 8:56:57 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

America betrayed by bipartisan treasonous senators one act at a time.


74 posted on 04/10/2013 8:59:30 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

Yeh I keep waiting for the other shoe to drop. All internet sales and also gun show sales already require a background check. I just bought a weapon on the internet and it had to be shipped to my FFL dealer and I had to have the background check. There must be a little paragraph in this bill somewhere that they are not telling us about.


75 posted on 04/10/2013 9:06:34 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

I was in the business of reading the tea leaves...


76 posted on 04/10/2013 9:15:26 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Statement from the National Rifle Association Regarding Toomey-Manchin Background Check Proposal

Posted on April 10, 2013

Fairfax, Va. - Expanding background checks at gun shows will not prevent the next shooting, will not solve violent crime and will not keep our kids safe in schools. While the overwhelming rejection of President Obama and Mayor Bloomberg’s “universal” background check agenda is a positive development, we have a broken mental health system that is not going to be fixed with more background checks at gun shows. The sad truth is that no background check would have prevented the tragedies in Newtown, Aurora or Tucson. We need a serious and meaningful solution that addresses crime in cities like Chicago, addresses mental health deficiencies, while at the same time protecting the rights of those of us who are not a danger to anyone. President Obama should be as committed to dealing with the gang problem that is tormenting honest people in his hometown as he is to blaming law-abiding gun owners for the acts of psychopathic murderers.

http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/news-from-nra-ila/2013/4/statement-from-the-national-rifle-association-regarding-toomey-manchin-background-check-proposal.aspx?s=&st=&ps=


77 posted on 04/10/2013 9:16:30 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If it truly does nothing more than extend background checks to commercial sales (meaning sales by businesses which do advertising), then this is really doing nothing at all.

I’m surprised there are that many commercial sales that aren’t already done by licensed gun dealers.

This would mean private (owner) sales would not be covered, which was the problematic part of the democrat proposal.

Of course, the devil is in the details.


78 posted on 04/10/2013 9:16:58 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

NEW RULE:

When you give your kid your prized Ruger 10-22, drag him down to the local FFL and make sure he’s got a clean record.

The America of my youth is dead.


79 posted on 04/10/2013 9:18:04 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Compliance with Tyranny is Treason...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Boehner were a Conservative, he wouldn’t allow any bill to be brought before the House.


80 posted on 04/10/2013 9:18:20 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Due Process 2013: "Burn the M*****-F***er Down!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson