Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RinaseaofDs

But that’s assuming that somebody in the US would retaliate or try to stop you. With Obama as the CINC that can’t be presumed. We all saw what he did in Benghazi. Our enemies are much more “flexible” if they’ve got one of their guys commanding the entire military response. Know what I mean?


178 posted on 04/04/2013 12:58:41 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

Concur completely. I think that’s why the Chinese are pushing the Norks. If he’s not willing to nuke somebody he knows he can take with nukes, why would he respond to a massive attack.

It’s why I believe we will be nuked on Wed as Eun promised. If we retaliate with nukes, we should be OK. If we don’t, then why wouldn’t Russia follow up with a strike that takes out both coasts but leaves the midwest intact?

The Norks will take out one or two cities I think, or they will try. This is also a ‘no bullshit, does your missile shield work’ test for the Soviets (Yep, they are still evil, even if they aren’t commies).


186 posted on 04/07/2013 5:22:35 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson