Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
For years The Economist was great at ferreting out junk environmental science.

Then they jumped on the AGW bandwagon, which they never should have done. Looks like they are starting, ever so slowly, to get off.

This nonsense has been going on for almost 30 years. People need to start asking hard questions. Why has there been no significant warming for so many years? Where are the great seaports that were supposed to be flooded? Where are the small island nations that were supposed to dissappear? Where are the vast swaths of lost cropland in the Northern Hemisphere? Why have the predictions not come true? Why no reaction to the exposure of the Hockey Stick as a fraud? Why no reaction to the Climagate evidence of rigged "science"?

If mainstream publications like The Economist start asking these questions the tried and true response of calling the questioner names and screaming "settled" isn't going to satisfy them.

12 posted on 04/02/2013 4:36:16 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker

Here, here. I used to subscribe, because it used to be the most cogent reporting on the planet.

The left got a hold of it and then anything and everything got past the editors.

Can’t read it anymore. Too small a form factor to serve as a decent fish wrap either.


43 posted on 04/03/2013 12:59:13 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson