Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike

I say this in all seriousness:

We are not very far away from suggesting that male circumcision become a) mandatory, and b) including the entire penis.

They will float the idea that sexual penetration is to violent an act to countenance any more, and that it would be better to do away with penii.

All sex will be in vitro.

Moreover, they will cite health care savings and public safety as the reasons for doing it.

Kelo gutted the 4th Amendment. The 14th gutted the 9th and 10th. The 17th helped with the 9th and 10th. Obamacare being upheld gutted the 1st. They are taking big swings at the 2nd as we speak.

Both parties seem to be moving the country off of the founders model for the government, and what is laughable, they are moving it to the very model the Soviets warned Nassar back in the 1970’s NOT TO DO - totalitarianism with a planned economy.

Forced penilectomy, for the good of the kids? I absolutely see that as possible. Did anyone in a million years think a bunch of goat humpers would run planes into the WTC or that we’d be seriously discussing not only the legality of sodomites having families, but also the eventuality that men marrying boys would also be deemed LEGAL as well by SCOTUS.

That’s what this decision, if done in this court, will do.


59 posted on 03/28/2013 9:56:06 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RinaseaofDs

You can’t just take the frank, you gotta take the beans as well.


62 posted on 03/28/2013 10:02:01 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson