George Zimmerman Case – O’Mara Files Motion To Reconsider Deposition of Benjamin Crump

The Conservative Treehouse ^ | March 18, 2013 | Sundance

[Uncle Chip]

Mark O’Mara has filed a motion with the court for reconsideration of Judge Nelson’s prior ruling regarding Benjamin Crump’s ineligibility for deposition.

............................

This motion will affectionately be called “Tara’s Motion“, because the diligence of Treeper Tara appears to have given the defense a key tool in its position. Specifically the ABC audio tape which was mysteriously uploaded onto the ABC website on February 28th, which Tara discovered.

There are multiple substantive arguments in the motion filed by O’Mara outlining the defense position that Trayvon Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, is specifically a key witness for deposition surrounding all of the elements regarding discovery of Witness #8, Dee Dee; Who, coincidently was deposed last Friday.

...........................

Additionally, within the filing keen insightful followers will note “Exhibit K“, the letter Benjamin Crump sent to the Federal Dept of Justice outlining his allegations of corruptions and collusion within the Sanford Police Dept.

But it is highly pertinent for those understanding the “Big Picture” to note who is copied on that letter. Note the names on the “CC”, and contrast against THIS STORY from today, and THIS STORY from last week.

[Ignatz]

My apologies, Jeff, you did only post one reply to the original post.
But we did read the original AND your reply, both stressing we should take note of who was CC’d, yet neither actually SAID who it was. That’s my point.
But I was incorrect to accuse you of making two posts with links instead of information. Again, I apologize.

[Jeff Chandler]

Thank you.

I work at a computer all day and I take occasional mini-breaks to cleanse the palate of my mind. Sometimes I come here. When I saw that the content was not rich text and the three links did not go anywhere, I went to the article and highlighted a section of the text starting before and ending after the links—just enough to give them context—and used my developer plugin to grab the source code behind the highlighted text. I pasted that into a reply and went back to work. The text made it appear that I was telling you to go to the link, but that’s the exact verbiage in the article, not my words.

[Uncle Chip]

Thug Night at Howard University:

http://www.law.howard.edu/1662

[Uncle Chip]

Crump: We’ll Give the Defense What it Wants

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oX6aul9w82k