Skip to comments.
Rand Paul: I Don’t Think Obama Will Kill Americans
TPM Livewire ^
| 03/06/2013
| Igor Bobic -
Posted on 03/06/2013 2:43:22 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), filibustering John Brennan's nomination to lead the CIA on Wednesday in objection to the Obama administration's policy on targeted drone killing, ceded that President Obama personally was not the issue.
"I frankly don't think he'll be killing people in their homes tonight," Paul said.
At stake, Paul explained, was the prospect of unchecked power afforded to the executive branch if clear rules governing lethal force within the United States are not established.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: randpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-54 next last
Comforting and reassuring, no?
To: Responsibility2nd
I think he will. I think he already has.
But I’m nobody.
2
posted on
03/06/2013 2:45:03 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: Responsibility2nd
How could 0bama ever do such a thing if he’s not responsible for or accountable for ANYTHING? I bet he wouldn’t release illegal aliens from detention centers, either!
To: Steely Tom
No, no. The operative word is
tonight.
As in, B. Hussein will prolly take tonight off.
4
posted on
03/06/2013 2:48:46 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Responsibility2nd
well, not unless they really deserve it, that is...
5
posted on
03/06/2013 2:49:02 PM PST
by
bigbob
To: Responsibility2nd
I don't see Obama with the joystick in his hand -- hell, he has enough trouble pointing a shotgun in the right direction -- but I can see him watching Glenn Beck Or Rush Limbaugh and saying
'We have to do something about this guy' in a leading way to one of his stooges...
Watch the skies!
6
posted on
03/06/2013 2:50:06 PM PST
by
DJ Frisat
((optional, printed after my name on post))
To: Responsibility2nd
"I frankly don't think he'll be killing people in their homes tonight," Paul said.
Check back around this summer Mr. Paul...
I'm betting the SHTF by August.
7
posted on
03/06/2013 2:50:52 PM PST
by
45semi
(A police state is always preceded by a nanny state...)
To: Responsibility2nd
Funny, I have been wondering all day just how many breaths of O2 Rand has left after this move.
8
posted on
03/06/2013 2:52:37 PM PST
by
riri
(Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
To: Responsibility2nd
I frankly don't think he'll be killing people in their homes tonight Yeah, we never thought that Daddy Bush would do it at Ruby Ridge, or that Clinton would do it at Waco either.
9
posted on
03/06/2013 2:53:18 PM PST
by
Sarajevo
(Don't think for a minute that this excuse for a President has America's best interest in mind.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Just need to kill one to start the snowball rolling. Law abiding citizens will protest and then they will also be targets. It’s the end of the world as we knew it. But I feel fine.
10
posted on
03/06/2013 2:53:20 PM PST
by
showme_the_Glory
(ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government)
To: Responsibility2nd
Anyone who starts a sentence with “I don’t think..” probably doesn’t.
11
posted on
03/06/2013 2:53:20 PM PST
by
rfreedom4u
(I have a copy of the Constitution! And I'm not afraid to use it!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Why can’t we get a straight answer from Holder on this?
To: riri
But he will allow them to die !
Benghazi for the Daily Double Alex!
13
posted on
03/06/2013 2:54:22 PM PST
by
Conserev1
("Still Clinging to my Bible and my Weapon")
To: Responsibility2nd
That’s what the Jews thought about Hitler at first
14
posted on
03/06/2013 2:58:24 PM PST
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Responsibility2nd
Unless you’re in Benghazi
15
posted on
03/06/2013 2:59:25 PM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Responsibility2nd
Senator Paul’s name has shot towards the top of 0bama’s kill list after today.
To: Responsibility2nd
Won’t kill Americans? Not even if they’re “typical white people” or “people who bitterly cling to their guns and religion”? How about policemen who “behave stupidly” as did the Cambridge Police Dept a few years back? Or those who might wantonly,without just cause,kill his “son”,as George Zimmerman did?
17
posted on
03/06/2013 3:00:30 PM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
("Progressives" toss the word "racist" around like chimps toss their feces)
To: Responsibility2nd
18
posted on
03/06/2013 3:00:49 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Responsibility2nd
It was like pulling Holder’s teeth to get an answer out of him.
In light of Holder’s testimony, it appears to me, Holder/Obama likes to have the option to even drone attack who they see as their political enemies.
To: Responsibility2nd
Its a diplomatic statement and doesn’t mean much.
Its up to us to make sure that people know Obama will happily kill Americans.
20
posted on
03/06/2013 3:02:35 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Responsibility2nd
yes indeedie.
the fact the the American people are even worried that their government will soon attack them with military tanks and over billion combat-type bullets (not to mention drones in the skies)
just the fact that America has been made to worry about its “government gone wild”
is itself an extremely serious problem indicative of the type of failed leadership we have in most of our politicians today
To: cripplecreek
Obama won’t kill any Americans. He’ll make someone else do it so he doesn’t take any blame.
22
posted on
03/06/2013 3:14:40 PM PST
by
donhunt
(Certified and proud "Son of a Bitch".)
To: Responsibility2nd
I don't think Oboma will kill Americans at the very heart of this issue is an implied question; do I trust this government to do what is right and good for me, my family and this country? Rand Paul is asking it and by any American having to ask that question, in and of itself provides the answer.
To: ConservaTexan
Basically what I just said on another thread.
What they all must realize now is they need to ALL come forward and be brazen and vocal. He can't kill them all.
Right now, Woodward, paul and Cruz need to be very careful.
And I wish I was just paranoid.
24
posted on
03/06/2013 3:18:36 PM PST
by
riri
(Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Rand Paul: I Dont Think Obama Will Kill Americans And neither would Clinton. Janet Reno on the other hand...
Now about Eric Holder or Janet Napalitano...
25
posted on
03/06/2013 3:19:42 PM PST
by
BruceS
To: donhunt
Obama would have killed the Hutaree rather than risk them all being acquitted.
26
posted on
03/06/2013 3:22:24 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Steely Tom
He most certainly has killed Americans. The biggest danger I see is these pansyassed PC politicians underestimating the guile of the Zero.
To: Responsibility2nd
Obama assassinate US citizens in this country? Nawwww... really?
28
posted on
03/06/2013 3:24:24 PM PST
by
Mashood
To: Responsibility2nd
If the Brown Clown kills AMERICANS on American soil he better brush up on the Bible verse of “ An Eye For An Eye”
29
posted on
03/06/2013 3:25:50 PM PST
by
Renegade
To: donhunt
The question is: Does one man alone, oboma, a racist and bigot with a chip on his shoulder, have the right to kill Americans on American soil at will?
That's what this is. The rest doesn't matter. The title of "Terrorist" will be his and his alone to give.
That's a pretty scary thought. That's how far America has fallen.
The left supports a dictatorial drone program - for now. If the economy can hold out until 2016 and we take the presidency with, say, a outspoken TEA Party member, will they still feel the same? Would they still feel secure in their homes?
To: Responsibility2nd
I have no doubt that Obama will target people on his enemies list as soon as he can.
31
posted on
03/06/2013 3:27:37 PM PST
by
clamper1797
(De-throne King Obozo)
To: DJ Frisat
“Who will rid me of this turbulent Priest?!?!”
;)
32
posted on
03/06/2013 3:30:24 PM PST
by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
To: Responsibility2nd
And Rand moves one more place toword GOPe... Punk.
33
posted on
03/06/2013 3:31:32 PM PST
by
thoolou
("I may have invented it, but Bill made it famous." - David Bradley, inventor of Ctrl-Alt-Del)
To: Responsibility2nd; All
FYI, Brian Williams just read the headlines for his evening newscast.
Not one word about the filibuster or the drone strike situation. The MSM is going to ignore this just like everything else that might cast the President in an unfavorable light.
34
posted on
03/06/2013 3:36:17 PM PST
by
Bratch
To: Responsibility2nd
So if we have “clear rules” the Executive can murder people without due process?
35
posted on
03/06/2013 3:36:25 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Due Process 2013: "Burn the M*****-F***er Down!")
To: Responsibility2nd
From the filibuster:
Paraphrased slightly: “The point is the president should come forward and explain his position.
Whether or not we believe in America that there are some rights in America we are not giving up on.
It’s about constitutional principles that we should not give up on.
We need to fight for something that is classicly American. Our individual rights. To be tried on a court by our peers.” ~ Senator Rand Paul
36
posted on
03/06/2013 3:37:49 PM PST
by
Beowulf9
To: Responsibility2nd
Tell that to Young, Bland and Spencer of the Trinity church, Harris and a little kid in Jakarta.
37
posted on
03/06/2013 3:38:21 PM PST
by
bgill
To: Bratch
And now they’re talking about it.
And they’re giving a pretty balanced report. Another accomplishment for Senator Paul.
38
posted on
03/06/2013 3:39:26 PM PST
by
Bratch
To: donhunt
Hell make someone else do it so he doesnt take any blame.And then he can claim he didn't know anything about it.
39
posted on
03/06/2013 3:43:18 PM PST
by
bgill
To: Responsibility2nd
His methodology for domestic issues is a little more subtle.
To: Responsibility2nd
Clever wording by Paul. He’s putting the concept out there before Americans who might never have considered it, and doing it in a way that guarantees a lot of media outlets will pick it up and repeat it as “proof” that Obama is a good guy...”even the right-wing Tea Partiers think so!”
41
posted on
03/06/2013 3:50:25 PM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
(CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
To: bgill
And then he can claim he didn't know anything about it. Followed by blaming it on Buuuuuush and the Repubs.
To: 45semi
Check back around this summer Mr. Paul...
I'm betting the SHTF by August. I'm guessing 4th of July.
He would want to crap on America's holiday, and all he needs to do is fail to fund EBT cards on July 1st.
43
posted on
03/06/2013 4:22:40 PM PST
by
null and void
(Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
To: Responsibility2nd
He would love to call in drone strikes tonight. Nothing would give this little Hitler more pleasure. Someone has to stop this.
44
posted on
03/06/2013 4:26:47 PM PST
by
Doc Savage
("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
To: Responsibility2nd
After a particularly fired-up rally in Minnesota, Mr McCain was booed when he tried to soothe the crowd, defending Mr. Obama as “a decent person and a person you do not have to be scared of as president of the United States.”
45
posted on
03/06/2013 4:45:36 PM PST
by
mirkwood
(project gutenberg)
To: Responsibility2nd
I’m wondering if the “tonight” wasn’t a bit of a zing.
46
posted on
03/06/2013 4:56:07 PM PST
by
mykroar
(Sig is pending a Conservative party.)
To: bgill
Clinton and Janet Reno attacked and murdered citizens and got away with it.
47
posted on
03/06/2013 5:09:51 PM PST
by
doosee
To: Responsibility2nd
“Rand Paul: I Dont Think Obama Will Kill Americans”
Cool, it’s a rhetorical question: I don’t think that Italians will hang Mussolini from meat hooks in Milanese Square.
- ...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said. [Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften [immigration, gay marriage] stance]
- One day after announcing on his radio show that he is "truly considering" running in 2014 for the U.S. Senate seat now held by New Jersey's Frank Lautenberg, Rivera amped up his message today in a television interview and a column on the Fox News Latino website... a moderate Republican who is fiscally conservative but also supports gay marriage and Roe v. Wade... [Geraldo Rivera declares himself a 'moderate Republican' as he eyes U.S. Senate run]
49
posted on
03/06/2013 6:27:59 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
To: Responsibility2nd
"I frankly don't think he'll be killing people in their homes tonight," Paul said.What about tomorrow night?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson