Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/17/2013 11:35:29 AM PST by JohnPDuncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: JohnPDuncan
I for one am not ready to throw away my principles and vote for a Libertarian for any office much less the WH. Rand Paul occasionally says things that sound good but that reminds me of others who can make nice speeches and say nice sounding things but end up making voters regret they were so easily taken in by a smooth talker. Does Obama ring any bells?!

Before I could even consider Paul for anything I would have to know a lot more about him to say the least. His daddy is enough to give Rand a lot of negative baggage right out of the gate. Rarely doe the acorn not fall too far from the tree. And besides it is way too early to start saying who we should or should not back. Need to see who all is getting in.

88 posted on 02/17/2013 2:29:04 PM PST by Ron H. (Hussein Obama, the 21st century American Balkanizer - 'Yes I Can')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

Holding out judgement on Rand Paul. The fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree.


89 posted on 02/17/2013 2:32:43 PM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

He’s definitely right about the younger generation. We should not underestimate how many of them have refused to put their support behind Obama or the vast majority of Republican candidates - simply because they can’t distinguish among any of them on critical domestic or foreign issues. And while there were a ton of problems with Ron Paul - and so do not get me wrong here, I am not a Paulbot in any way, shape or form - the reality is that no candidate was anywhere near as effective as Ron Paul in uniting younger voters with vastly different views on social and foreign policy issues. Rand Paul seems to be essentially Ron Paul only without the excessive conspiracy mongering and without some of his father’s more problematic foreign policy views. Obviously, not everyone here is gonna be particularly happy with all of his views, policies or actions - since when is that true for any state, local or federal politician - but at least in my view, those of us who are truly serious about keeping America alive should be celebrating this guy.


105 posted on 02/17/2013 3:19:52 PM PST by pythonjavaawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

“”I do support the concept of telling the 11 million people here that if you want to work and you don’t want to be on welfare, we’re wiling to find a place for you in America,” he said.”

Amnesty by any name or conditions is still an invasion gone unchallenged.


111 posted on 02/17/2013 3:53:53 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

Once again you’re here posting your pro-liberal crap and trying to tie Rand Paul into the liberaltarian party.

Are you looking at the negative responses to Rand as a liberaltarian? Maybe I’ve been wrong about your intentions.

Maybe you really don’t like Rand Paul and your here throwing dirt his way in order to discredit him.

Reverse psychology. Cool.


113 posted on 02/17/2013 7:15:57 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

Quack, Waddle - Fiscally “Conservative” RINO

Next?


119 posted on 02/17/2013 8:20:49 PM PST by TArcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

As far as the prigs are concerned, the only isms dissimilar to statism are pedophilia-ism, drug-ism, homosexual-ism, etc.

The next time you encounter a Conservative that holds the Republican Party and its RINOs in contempt, find out if the sentiment includes republicanism. Then await the stream of hypocritical bullshit on the subject of libertarianism.


123 posted on 02/17/2013 10:43:43 PM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

Someone mentioned Rand Paul! Quick, close the door before all the Paultards... oh, never mind, they’re already here and the OP is one of them. After all, he has posted 16 threads about Rand Paul in the 38 days since he started posting. Not bad for an account that’s only “Since Dec 22, 2012.”

New Paul, same old Paulbots. See his greatest hits, such as:

“Rand Paul Is the Republican to Watch in 2013” - 15 Feb
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2988844/posts

“After Ron Paul, What Now For Libertarians?” - 10 Feb
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2986948/posts

“Rand Paul Makes It Clear: ‘I Really Think’ Obama May Have Had a ‘Gun-Running Operation’ in Libya” - 7 Feb
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2986317/posts

“Rand Paul: My amendment to stop F-16’s to Egypt vote tomorrow afternoon” - 31 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2983689/posts

“Rand Paul Will Propose Ban On Sending F-16s To Egypt” - 29 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2982923/posts

“Rand Paul: F-16 Sales to Muslim Brotherhood ‘A Mistake that Could Haunt Us’” - 25 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2981844/posts

“Rand Paul reacts to tense exchange with Hillary Clinton” - 25 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2981479/posts

“Rand Paul’s emerging conservative crusade” - 23 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2981113/posts

“Rand Paul: House leaders ‘retreated’ on debt ceiling” - 22 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2980657/posts

“Rand Paul in South Carolina on Inauguration day” - 22 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2980465/posts

“Rand Paul: GOP must ‘evolve and adapt’” - 20 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2980149/posts

“Rand Paul To Hammer Hillary Clinton On Benghazi: ‘It Was A Career-Ending Mistake’” - 16 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2978480/posts

“Rand Paul On Gun Control: Obama’s No King” - 15 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2978039/posts

“Rand Paul: Building in Jerusalem None Of Our Business” - 14 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2977777/posts

“Paul’s Mideast tour fuels talk of 2016 White House run” - 11 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2976837/posts

“Rand Paul In Israel: End The Gravy Train Of US Foreign Aid” - 10 Jan
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2976548/posts


146 posted on 02/18/2013 3:42:11 AM PST by Domalais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan
I wouldn't just vote for Rand Paul, I'd campaign for Rand Paul.
149 posted on 02/18/2013 6:21:07 AM PST by arderkrag (An Unreconstructed Georgian, Forever in Rebellion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

I’m voting for anyone who isn’t an anti 10th Amendment, New World Order, crony capitalist, globalist. I’m voting against anyone who is friends with a Bush, a Romney, or a Rove. They are our country’s greatest enemies.


158 posted on 02/21/2013 3:07:01 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

How about a true Conservative instead? I’ll never be or vote for a pro-homosexual marriage, pro-prostitution, anti-natural law libertarian


175 posted on 02/22/2013 5:40:46 AM PST by frogjerk (Obama Claus is coming to town!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

GOP needs to become the party of common sense. Here’s where I feel we can improve while still maintaining conservative principals:

Current stance: no gay marriage anywhere... ever
Improved stance: leave it up to the states

Current stance: spend as much money as we can on defense
Improved stance: make military more efficient

Current stance: no drugs
Improved stance: leave it up to the states

Current stance: arrest and deport illegal immigrants
Improved stance: secure border (first) and create guest worker program. (second)

Current stance: abortion is wrong
Improved stance: abortion is really wrong

FYI, I believe homosexuality is a sin. However, gay marriage is coming regardless. The GOP can get ahead of this issue and declare it a states’ rights issue BEFORE the libs can make it a national law!


182 posted on 02/22/2013 7:42:18 AM PST by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnPDuncan

All the people bashing Rand Paul is ridiculous. I want an outsider, either him or Ted Cruz. Not a Bushie/Dole/McCain/Romney GOPe controlled tool like Rubio/Jeb/Ryan.


199 posted on 02/22/2013 1:20:12 PM PST by RB156
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson