Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Mostly correct but these two words stand out as false to me.

“Shale oil (light tight oil) is rapidly emerging as a significant and relatively low cost new unconventional resource in the US,

These wells are neither cheap, nor long lasting. It requires more expensive wells and the wells don't last long a high flow rates. Which means you need more of them; we have to keep drilling just to hold a steady flow rate.

3 posted on 02/15/2013 3:45:34 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: thackney
"These wells are neither cheap, nor long lasting. It requires more expensive wells and the wells don't last long a high flow rates. Which means you need more of them; we have to keep drilling just to hold a steady flow rate."

Well, I think economics would dictate that as demand continues, the cost of such wells would drop, and we would have a lot more wells producing even at the lower rates.

What "is" the typical production curve for one of these guys.

11 posted on 02/15/2013 4:28:41 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
you forgot to include the meaning of the word "relatively" in your analysis - and compared to deep water, compared to windmills, etc, this IS relatively low cost.
16 posted on 02/15/2013 5:39:17 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson