Who, under the Constitution, is empowered to decide factual, legal and constitutional issues concerning the qualifications of candidates?
That's the important question. This fellow's case has demonstrated only that the federal executive and judicial branches are unwilling to decide that a lieutenant colonel has been empowered to decide in even a preliminary way the factual, legal or constitutional issues concerning Obama's qualifications to be president. Those two branches of government have taken the position that this lieutenant colonel exceeded his authority and that he had no right to impede the orderly operation of the military while he litigates and debates his theories of our constitution.
That really shouldn't be too hard for you to accept, but accept it or not, that is the simple reality of this case.
The courts, and not one of them has subjected ANY evidence to the scrutiny required under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
All the people’s petitions to the government for a redress of grievances have been sent away without ANY evidentiary hearing. It’s a travesty. OUR CONSTITUTION is none of our stinkin’ business, in the eyes of this government. Even Stalin would be proud of Soros’ coup.