Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JustSayNoToNannies

I digressed. The problem ith any theory of evolution is time, which was my point. There are only 10exp28 nanoseconds in the history of the universe. There is not enough time to account for even the simplest changes in macro evolution.

How does evolution say that bio molecules came about then, if not by random chance? Unless, of course, you are now proceeding from Darwinism to Chemical evolution. Which was in one of my earlier posts.


32 posted on 02/06/2013 5:28:52 PM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: D Rider
There are only 10exp28 nanoseconds in the history of the universe. There is not enough time to account for even the simplest changes in macro evolution.

Perhaps. You have yet to demonstrate that this is true - although evolutionists have not demonstrated that it is false.

How does evolution say that bio molecules came about then, if not by random chance?

Already answered in my previous post: 'And evolution explicitly denies that biomolecules came about through "random chance" but says that at every stage those with a survival advantage were favored over others.'

Unless, of course, you are now proceeding from Darwinism to Chemical evolution.

No real difference - chemical evolution is now understood to be the mechanism by which Darwinian evolution occurs.

33 posted on 02/07/2013 7:07:40 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson