Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D Rider
Also, the point is the lack of transitional forms supporting Darwinian e.

There are a bazillion transitional forms supporting evolution. Look at the near-complete sequence we have for the evolution of horses, or the now much more complete sequence we have for whales (including whales with legs, whales with vestigal legs, to whales with internal leg remnants, etc.)

Of course the problem is:

Creationist: There's no transitional fossil between A and C!

Paleontologist: I just found B, which is transitional between A and C.

Creationist: Now there's no transitional fossil between A and B, OR B and C! Evolution is disproven!

10 posted on 02/01/2013 11:55:33 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist

The real problem is the DNA coding. There are no transitional forms that make the case of macro evolution. Darwinism was replaced with chemical evolution in upper level biology. As that proves unsatisfactory, (happening now,) it will be replaced with something else. Science is rarely static.


21 posted on 02/02/2013 9:40:59 AM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Strategerist
"whales with legs, whales with vestigal legs, to whales with internal leg remnants"

These prove that whales have evolved into whales.

30 posted on 02/06/2013 12:31:26 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson