Posted on 01/31/2013 5:14:16 AM PST by Perseverando
That would be “culturist”, not “racist”.
Insist on the definition of actual racism (judging based on genetic, not behavioral, differences), and make the left defend the value of the “urban culture” in comparison to the distinct “American” culture of Western Civilization.
Excellent post.
There’s something about a 70% plus illegitimacy rate that doesn’t make good citizens.
The Great Society has done a fine job, completely destroying the black family structure in two generations.
Actually, the correct term is “ethnocentric”
Unfortunately, these days ethnicity is being deliberately tied to race rather than culture, so “ethnocentristity” is percieved as racism. When it really isn’t.
“Racism” - the cry of the intellectually lazy when they don’t want to defend the destructive or embarrassing cultural tendencies of an ethnic group, but would rather cow into silence those who would dare criticize those behaviors.
Yes, that is true. And it would not be a bad idea if we could get through to the hunters who currently may be not terribly concerned about their rifles since they are not the “scary” kind.
We need to tell them that it won’t be long before their guns are described as “medium range sniper weapons,” as you point out.
We lost the war on poverty and the war on drugs. This is the result.
1964-2013 is 49 years, many people have kids in that community (if not aborted at the current 50% rate) from 14-17 years old.
If Great Granny had a baby @ 16 in 1964, then Granny in 1980, then Mommy in 1996 and a new one born last year, 2012, as the current generation...you could have five generations in those years.
1
17
33
49
65
All using the cornucopia of Social Services (food stamps, Section 8, AFDC, Medicaid, ObamaPhones, utility subsidy, etc.)
Think about the opportunity cost of spending $30K per head, via a Government worker (social worker, Social Security office, etc.), so you spend $100,000 in someone earnings to support ONE of these people, much less 5.
Someone taxed at 50%, plus the cost of Government worker to dole it out is $100K in earnings...
This is not solely a racial thing, there are plenty of people who have gotten into this situation, some even in my in-laws family (4 kids, 4 dads, trailer, drugs, pit bulls, fat, tattoos, drunks).
The 70% illegitimacy rate you refer to is nationwide, and a weighted average...I heard a black minister on the conservative radio station here whose congregation was in Oakland, CA and he said in the “inner city” say Baltimore, Detroit, East St. Louis, Compton, SE DC, etc. it was closer to 85%!
There is more money to be made from keeping the father out of the home, so that’s what happens.
Sad, and a real reason we are broken as a nation, not just financially, but morally, too.
Agree completely. Using labels in that manner is really a bullying tactic that makes a Liberal feel superior by putting someone they disagree with in their place.
It’s great fun to call Liberals “bullies” for doing do. It drives them right into sputtering indignitude.
Check out the comments on the link. Some are pretty good!
Here is a sample:
“How about a new reality show called “Urban Hunter”. Legal gun owners with concealed carry permits dress up like wealthy businessmen and women who are lost. They set off on foot into the most dangerous urban cities in America. When attacked by a mob, they open fire and the paticipant who bags the perp with the longest rap sheet wins the grand prize (an AR-15).”
It isn’t JUST money.
It’s the almost complete lack of any family structure. 80% of black children are illegitimate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.