Frankenstein can kiss it...I am not seeing this NFA requirement in the current form of the legislation. It looks like she backed away from it. Even the article you linked pulls this requirement from a dec 27 draft of the bill.
But that’s not all:
Lessay you have 10 “AW”’s —to comply with the law and register them means you pay $200 for EACH...! Thus a law abider would have to pay $2,000...!!!
I’m also told that hi-cap mags would be NFA items and ALSO subject to the $200 tax...!
What happens to those with 100 mags? Such people pay $20,000 to comply...?!?!
F U D F!
Well since we’re going to sit on our collective asses and let them disarm us so as to be the smartest people in the room, why not?
I foresee a tragic boating accident in my future, and the loss of everything aboard.
Frankenstein can kiss it...*
*
Meanwhile, the last school shooting, at a college in Houston,is not the kind they might have hoped it was,
to accelerate the momentum for a larger and more comprehensive, mired-in-bureaucratic regulations, fines, taxes and punishments gun-grab. Turns out that shooting was more like a Chicago or L.A. gangbanger personal thing, between two “youths” who had a score to settle. That’s why it is now officially dead.
No.
The 1911 Colt could be banned under her bill.
See bad guns here.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2981469/posts?page=44#44
She still hasn’t formally introduced the bill yet.
The federal assault-weapons ban, scheduled to expire in September, is not responsible for the nation’s steady decline in gun-related violence and its renewal likely will achieve little, according to an independent study commissioned by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ).
“We cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation’s recent drop in gun violence. And, indeed, there has been no discernible reduction in the lethality and injuriousness of gun violence,” said the unreleased NIJ report, written by Christopher Koper, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania.
“It is thus premature to make definitive assessments of the ban’s impact on gun violence. Should it be renewed, the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement,” said the report, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Times.
The report also noted that assault weapons were “rarely used in gun crimes even before the ban.”
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/aug/16/20040816-114754-1427r/#ixzz2IwFDjENZ
as long as it makes Di-Fi FEEL good.