Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TaxPayer2000

They could end poverty 4X over but couldn’t pay off the US national debt.


2 posted on 01/20/2013 9:53:14 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DManA
National debt? They couldn't even pay off the projected overspend for this year.

Oxfam's report is fair enough, but it ignores some rather unpalatable truths. The problem has never been shortage of resources, or even shortage of good will from the rich countries. After all, most Westerners are of good heart and have no wish to see others suffer. The real problem is the shortage of infrastructure in the 3rd World. You can buy food for their starving millions, but how do you distribute it? There is a shortage of transport and very few good roads. How do you store it? There aren't enough warehouses and few of them have refrigeration. How do you protect it from the bandits and warlords who pretty much control most of the rural areas and would sell it for drugs and guns? Even if aid gets to the needy, how do we stop them from becoming dependent on aid?

12 posted on 01/20/2013 10:04:26 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

That’s the fallacy of their thinking; it wouldn’t “end” poverty. If all wealth were gven equally to every person on the planet it would not be equal for long. It would be far worse because the wealth producing people would disappear if everything was going to be confiscated all the time.


65 posted on 01/20/2013 11:40:06 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson