Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ProtectOurFreedom
The Puritans, who were at the time fleeing to the New World, began a practice of refusing to cooperate with interrogations.

Actually, the Puritans continued the practice of compelling "cooperation" in New England.

See the case of Giles Corey, who was pressed to death during the Salem Witch Trials while heroically refusing to plead guilty or innocent.

As with so many things, the Puritans weren't opposed to such practices, they just wanted to be the ones in charge of using them. For instance, they were most definitely not in favor of "freedom of religion" for the individual. They were in favor of the freedom of the state to impose the "right" religion on all individuals.

51 posted on 01/20/2013 7:33:20 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

Good points. Thanks for clarifying. “Freedom of conscience for me, but not for thee.”?

Nevertheless, compelled testimony against oneself was common and it would seem this is a first step backwards toward that practice.


72 posted on 01/20/2013 9:39:07 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson