[Teacher317]

Read the British warning again. It merely states that if you later offer a defense at trial based on facts that could have been offered at the time of arrest, your failure to assert this “defense” at the time of arrest can, correctly in my opinion, be weighed by the jury in determining the facts in the case. It’s just common sense.

The only common-sense conclusion one can draw from that situation is that your lawyer chose your defense poorly. Exactly how does having a bad attorney become an indicator of guilt?

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

You are either not paying attention or don’t want to listen.