Skip to comments.
OBAMA'S 23 EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUNS
Fox Nation ^
| Jan 16
| Staff
Posted on 01/16/2013 9:16:55 AM PST by JesseWatters
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
To: Mamzelle
Whats with Precious today? His face looks swollen, his skin looks broken out. Hes listless and depressed. Is he hung over? Sick? Anyone else notice?Crack cocaine.
41
posted on
01/16/2013 9:32:53 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(LAZ'S LAW: As an argument with liberals goes on, the probability of being called racist approaches 1)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
What does “maximize” mean?
42
posted on
01/16/2013 9:32:53 AM PST
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: Timber Rattler
Guaranteed that within these seemingly innocent proposals is something that will bite us in the butt.
For example:
4. Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.
Hmmm... “categories of individuals” that constitute “dangerous people”...??? As judged by that paragon of virtue, Eric Holder???
Hint: Black Panthers NO. Free Republic posters YES.
43
posted on
01/16/2013 9:33:00 AM PST
by
Nervous Tick
(Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
To: basil
My Dr. has gun and hunting magazines in his office.
Not a Time or Newsweek to be found in there for 5 years now
44
posted on
01/16/2013 9:33:01 AM PST
by
digger48
To: JesseWatters
MSM logic.
crazy people are prohibited from owning a gun.
anyone who has a gun is crazy
anyone who wants a gun is prohibited from owning a gun.
next it will be anyone who wants private property.
THE MSMS IS the enemy.
45
posted on
01/16/2013 9:33:08 AM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Hardastarboard
LOL. Attended a few, haven’t you?
46
posted on
01/16/2013 9:34:21 AM PST
by
Obadiah
(Those who will not hear the messengers of peace, shall be made to hear the messengers of war.)
To: All
This should be the clarion call to all of those that think we can survive Obama. Once they have the 50%+1 vote, they will ban guns and they will come for them.
47
posted on
01/16/2013 9:34:42 AM PST
by
newnhdad
(Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
To: JesseWatters
Does this mean ER Doctor’s can now report drug addicts clogging up the ERs to the federal government and get them on a no buy list?
48
posted on
01/16/2013 9:34:46 AM PST
by
RC one
(.From My Cold Dead Hands.)
To: txrefugee
Hmm, my doctor asks me about guns and she gets one answer ~ it's none of your business and you don't want to find out.
That's the old Jedi Knight mind trick.
49
posted on
01/16/2013 9:34:46 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Timber Rattler
DITTO: that, eye wash for the morons.
50
posted on
01/16/2013 9:34:53 AM PST
by
boomop1
(term limits will only save this country.)
To: cuban leaf
#2 is about trying to loophole\bypass HIPPA privacy. That may take a bill from congress.
#16 is also kinda scary.
I went to the VA and they asked me if I owned any guns.
I said “HUH?
They said they could ask but I didn’t have to tell them anything. I’m guessing that will be the gist of # 16.
but the rest seems like Obama bailed.
Most of that stuff is somewhat in place in some form or another.
51
posted on
01/16/2013 9:34:53 AM PST
by
stylin19a
(Obama - Fredo smart)
To: Dead Corpse
Yep. I think that is the purpose of a “National Campaign”.
52
posted on
01/16/2013 9:35:45 AM PST
by
Aevery_Freeman
(Proud Thought Criminal since 1984)
To: JesseWatters
I could see this skunk going after the availability of ammo
more than guns.
To: JesseWatters
This list appears to be mostly fluff.
To: JesseWatters
On the Obamacare part of requiring doctors to get gun information. Hey, Roberts, happy now?
To: txrefugee
“Sorry Doc, it’s none of your business. By the way, have you ever have a medical practice complaint filed against you, or a malpractice lawsuit?”
To: JesseWatters
17. Release a letter to health care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law enforcement authorities. Can't wait til someone invokes 'Right to Privacy' as "found" in 'Roe v Wade'
57
posted on
01/16/2013 9:37:40 AM PST
by
11th_VA
(When in the course of Human Events ...)
To: Mamzelle
Hungover from the Down-Low...
To: Menehune56
You are not under legal oath when you visit a doctor. Nothing says you have to answer that question truthfully.
59
posted on
01/16/2013 9:38:44 AM PST
by
mnehring
To: bunkerhill7
The people at Columbine for the most part could not exercise their right to assemble because (1) They were minors, or (2) they were employees.
The kiddies, in fact, were there mostly because the state's mandatory school attendance laws said they had to be there.
Maybe Obama would like to UNDO school attendance laws, maybe public schools ~ get the kids out of those prison like structures that were so terribly difficult for them to ESCAPE when attacked.
60
posted on
01/16/2013 9:38:57 AM PST
by
muawiyah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson