[SmileRight]

There's a reason they have recommended several "executive action" items. You can bet these are the areas Obama will hit first, without Congress.

[snoringbear]

Agree. Soros has been Obama’s puppet master from the get go.

[mountainlion]

George Soros is not an American citizen and has no constitutional rights. He in interfering with the internal workings of our country.

[factoryrat]

I wonder if ole soros dresses up in full nazi regalia, and gives the heil hitler in front of a full length mirror, the whole time acting like a giddy little school girl. Creepy, yet plausible.

[bmwcyle]

So the Elites for above pulling the strings for years are making their final plays to take America. Do you see now?

[FlingWingFlyer]

Once a Nazi, always a Nazi.

[SaxxonWoods]

My guns are quie well-controlled, so Soros and his buddies can go to....

[Windflier]

"The proposal targets three key areas:..."

Why the cliffhanger? FR allows a 300 word excerpt.

Maybe you're the author, and you want us to click through to rack up the hits on your piece. Is that it? Are you the author?

[MrBambaLaMamba]

George Soros should be executed as a war criminal.

[Mobilemitter]

“Liberal think-tank”. Made me laugh so hard ...

[Mobilemitter]

“Liberal think-tank”. Made me laugh so hard ...

[SWAMPSNIPER]

Much of the language is loaded. "Military grade weapons" is an inaccurate description of a semiauto Bushmaster, for example.

Further, are my M-38 Swede Mauser and Swiss K-31 open to being defined under the blanket of "military grade"?

We need people smarter than I am to go through this stuff ahead of time and catalog items likely to be abused, keeping in mind that a total ban is the ultimate goal.

The gun grabbers ARE building a foundation for further steps.

We must stay ahead of them.

[DustyMoment]

First, there are already more than 20,000 gun control laws actively on the books today and none of them prevented this tragedy. Second, millions upon million of people in America own guns and 99.9999% of them have never and will never do anything like this.

So, let’s lose the hysteria and analyze the facts - a PERSON did this, NOT a hunk of steel. In Portland, a PERSON killed two people in the mall, NOT a hunk of steel! In Denver, a PERSON shot up the theater, NOT a hunk of steel!!

NONE of these facts will matter to the gun-grabbing nanny-staters, because they focus solely on the gun and nothing else. So, what happens if ALL guns are outlawed and forcibly collected by the feds? Someone bent on committing mass murder may turn to knives, hatchets, chainsaws or machetes. So, we outlaw those. The next person to commit a heinous crime may use a bat, poison, poison gas or a semi-tractor. And the one after that may use a car, a pen or pencil, a rock, his hands . . . . . . so when do we blame the PERSON and NOT the inanimate weapon!???

The fact remains that until the left understands that murdering humans by ANY means including their favorite method, abortion, human life will be valueless and more copycats will come out to exercise their demented mass murder of innocent people.

All of that said, it occurs to me that the gun-grabbers are from the leftist school of complete control. What that means is that if 1 person commits a gun crime then, under the leftist theory of the “collective” and “groupthink”, they believe that ALL gun owners will commit mass murder unless they eliminate guns (good luck with that!). So, the calls for more gun control by the left after these incidents is twofold - eliminate the “balance of power” the Founding Fathers so carefully wove into the Constitution and gain total control over the people.

Another part that affects all of this is the fact that laws, whether gun laws, robbery laws, or whatever, are written solely to affect law-abiding citizens. People who commit crimes are called “outlaws” and criminals because they DON’T adhere to the laws created to control or stop their illegal activities.

So, should the left create additional gun control laws, will it prevent the next gun-related crime? Of course not. Laws only affect those of us who obey them. Those who disregard the law won’t be stopped from committing whatever crime they want to commit.

As a final note, Adam Lanza did not own the guns he used to murder all of the people at Sandy Hook Elementary. They were his mother’s guns and they were all legally purchased and registered. Which begs the question, what will any NEW gun control laws accomplish?

[Jim Noble]

Focus on WHY they want the guns.

WHAT do they want to do that they cannot, as long as we are armed?

[Windflier]

I see you still haven’t responded to my question as to whether you’re the author of this article. It’s been four hours since I asked, and five hours since you posted the thread.

You also haven’t responded to any of the other comments on the thread, ninety percent of which are directed to you.

[ronnie raygun]

Wishing the very desease if not worse that has joyfully infected Hugo chavez on his old wrinkled decrepid a##

[ez]

The worst thing about these proposals is that there is defacto registration through collecting all NICS data. You know, the data they said they would never collect.

The assault ban and hi-cap mag legislation SHOULD be doa in the house.

[eyedigress]

I demand Soros take a sweet kiss right between the eyes.

[Gritty]

I have an old Civil War 1863 Springfield military rifle which is a muzzleloader. It shoots a really mean rifled minnie-ball. Obviously, it is a military weapon and even carries a wicked looking bayonet. It is down right deadly in the wrong hands. It's a military pattern weapon.

Do I need to turn it in or will George Soros let me keep it??