I had to explain this to my lady friend (who voted Republican in 2012, although she is a life long Democrat):
I do not care whether or not the HI BC is a forgery. I accept it as the only document available and so do most people. It is apparent that no one in power to challenge O’s eligibility cares whether or not it is a forgery.
They all miss the point. Barack Hussein Obama Senior was not an American citizen. He was a Kenyan National, subject of the British Crown at the time of Barack’s conception, at birth, and until Senior’s death.
Unless Barack changes his claim of being the son of the senior Obama (i.e. American citizen Frank Marshall is his daddy), he is ineligible to be President. Period—end of conflict.
This is insane. We have a usurper in the White House, whose major achievements in office not only are unconstitutional on their face, his authority to sign anything into law, to make appointments and to govern as Chief Executive should be argued on the basis of paternity alone.
I am so sick of this, ignoring the five megaton elephant in the room.
Orly should know this, should argue this, it is in Obama’s own testimony in his ghost written books.
I weep for America.
the law does not recognize this third form of citizen. It only recognizes two. Naturalized and those born in the united states (regardless of parents).
The immigration law has changed substantially since the foundings. States no longer control. In the 1930’s limitations were put in place.
Subsequent reforms have even limited claims of birthright citizenship to “must live in the USA (military and territories count) for 10 continous years BEFORE the child is born”. The reason Taitz is a joke is because she continues to screw up basic law. It is similar to anti-second amendment types who focus on the “militia” language rather than the actual law/language/constitution.
If a third form of citizenship needs to be created, then create it by operation of the law.
sources http://www.uscis.gov