Argumentum Ad Ridiculum - Last but not least is the weapon of the loser and that is argumentum ad ridiculum or in plain English appeal to mockery and horse laugh. This of course has no intellectual value and serves only as a feel good factor for the loser.
You lose.
Smokeyblue: You lose.
In the make-believe world with citizenship laws that don't exist and Supreme Court rulings that never happened, I lose.
In the real world, where people actually have to prove things, Obama is still president.
None of you guys can explain why the RNC or any other prominent Republican will launch a serious challenge on this slum-dunk winning issue. Mitt Romney just spent half a billion dollars trying to win the presidency. Please explain why he doesn't have a team of the best conservative lawyers in the country in Washington right now fighting to prove he lost due to fraud.
OK, maybe Romney's a big loser, but what about Sarah Palin? Again: Sarah Palin has built her career taking on corruption, even when it wasn't what the GOP-e wanted her to do. This is a woman who would have been VP is it weren't for Obama's supposed fraudulent presidency. She might even be president now. Despite so much on the line both personally and patriotically, Sarah Palin hasn't even lifted a finger. Is she a big loser, too? Come on guys, clear this up for me, since you're so full of information.
Silence is consent, guys. The deafening silence on this issue means, "Yeah, OK, we accept Obama as a legitimate candidate." Why? Could it possibly be because he is? If he isn't you have a lot of explaining to do.
I'm going to take your collective silence on this question (which I've repeated several times) to mean that you think Sarah Palin is in on the fraud, in which case... well... I'll keep it civil and just say I think you should be ashamed of your position.