Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel
(I) A PISTOL GRIP;
...
(IV) A SHROUD ATTACHED TO THE BARREL, OR THAT PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELY ENCIRCLES THE BARREL, ALLOWING THE BEARER TO HOLD THE FIREARM WITH THE NON-TRIGGER HAND WITHOUT BEING BURNED, BUT EXCLUDING A SLIDE THAT ENCLOSES THE BARREL;

"pistol grip" and "shroud" would be interpreted to cover an M1A1 and an M1 carbine. Note also that they propose increased penalties if the citizen owns two to nine other Non prohibited firearms.

On the other hand, there apparently is a grandfather clause under tight restrictions (some of which are not clear in the proposed act...it's at para. S3)

45 posted on 01/03/2013 6:05:48 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: norton
On the other hand, there apparently is a grandfather clause under tight restrictions.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Nope. It says that they must be turned in, destroyed or rendered inoperable, even if they were legally owned prior to January 2014.

56 posted on 01/03/2013 6:21:41 PM PST by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson