Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bluecat6

From the website of www.OrlyTaitz.com (which seems to be inaccessible through the main page of google.com this morning):

“Yesterday a close friend of Obama’s family Gov. Abercrombie appointed Brian Schatz, former chair of the Dem party of HI to take over the seat of the former Senator from Hi, recently departed Senator Inouye. This was done against the wishes of the late Senator, who expressly sought a different candidate.

Today in the morning even CN seemed surprised, as they were reporting that Schatz was not an expected replacement.They reported that he hitchhiked a ride on the air force 1 to DC with Obama, but he is not an expected replacement. Additionally, CNN seemed to be puzzled by Obama’s sudden return to DC. As according to CNN Obama has nobody to talk to in DC: Boehner is in Ohio through the New Year, Members of Congress left DC, Dirty Harry is saying that he will not even draft a proposal without MCConnell agreeing to a simple majority to passing instead of a 60 super majority. So even CNN does not understand, what is Obama doing in DC, when he has no one to talk to there.

Well I have an idea. First, in relation to Schatz, he committed treason by becoming criminally complicit and signing a falsified OCON, falsified certificate of nomination of Obama, where the usual language “eligible according to Constitution” was removed and eligible according to regulations od the Democratic party was inserted.

So, Schatz was rewarded handsomely for his criminal complicity. Now he is a U.S. senator. As for Obama, even CNN suspects that his reason for flying to DC for Fiscal Cliff negotiations is bogus,as he has nobody to negotiate with. It is more likely, he will be huddled with his attorneys, possibly Bob Bauer and worried federal employees: Commissioner of Social Security Astrue, Director of Selective Service Romo, Postmaster Donahoe, all of whom covered up Obama’s forged IDs. Of Course Schatz will be there as well.

The question is, will those employees continue this criminal complicity or will they testify pursuant to subpoenas which I served them as they might decide that it is not worth going to prison for the rest of their lives or risk death penalty for treason, covering up for Obama. We’ll have to wait and see.

Incidenly, I received an e-mail from Montgomery Blair Sibley, which states: “it is impressive that you got them worried enough that they are throwing the kitchen sink at you with the “speech and debate” clause and “political question” issues”

I feel the same way.”


39 posted on 12/27/2012 10:32:16 AM PST by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: research99

From the blog http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com

Pay-To-Play: Obama Accomplice Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie
Appoints Other Obama Accomplice Brain Schatz To U.S. Senate

“ABC News propagates: Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie announced tonight Lt. Gov. Brian Schatz will replace the late Sen. Daniel Inouye as the U.S. senator from Hawaii — not Sen. Inouye’s first choice.

On the day he died, the late senator wrote a letter to Abercrombie asking that he pick Rep. Colleen Hanabusa, D-Hawaii, to replace him. [...]

Schatz served in the Hawaii House of Representatives from 1998 to 2006. In 2006, he launched an unsuccessful bid for a seat in the U.S. Congress.

Schatz served as chairman of the Democratic Party of Hawaii from 2008 to 2010. He was sworn in as lieutenant governor in December 2010.

Schatz named two priorities for his new appointment that rarely see action on the Senate floor: native Hawaiian recognition and climate change. [...]”

Related document scanned and posted online at:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/37528165/2000-2004-2008-Democratic-Party-of-Hawaii-Certifications-of-Nomination-for-Presidential-Candidates


40 posted on 12/27/2012 10:45:21 AM PST by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: research99

Throw Richard Flahavan into that mix. His responsiblities seem to extend beyond just Obama when it comes to ‘fix’ draft registration issues.

As it deals with Obama

http://theobamafile.com/_eligibility/DraftRegistration.htm

As it deals with another political leader.

http://www.hillbillyreport.org/diary/976/senator-mitch-mcconnells-military-service

“When we received the Selective Service Classification Records from the Selective Service System all of the records were included with the exception of Senator Mitch McConnell’s and his was an extract put together by Richard Flahavan, Associate Director for Intergovernmental Affairs. When Richard Flahavan was questioned about sending us an extract of Senator Mitch McConnell’s Selective Service Classification Record, he responded in writing that “ Selective Service no longer has access to Selective Service records for men born prior to 1960.” Knowing that we had already received the full Selective Service Classification Records for Senator Saxby Chambliss, Rep Tom Tancredo born in 1943 and 1945 respectively we felt that Richard Flahavan was possibly covering for Senator Mitch McConnell. In Richard Flahavan’s extract he writes “the U.S. Army ordered him to undergo an Armed Forces Physical Examination which he did July 9, 1967. Apparently, he did not pass because he was released from the U.S. Army Reserve August 15, 1967.” I just love that word apparently! “

The question on Schatz’s OCON is - what was the intent?

Was it an ‘innocent mistake’? If it was why not just refile with the required verbiage? Did Schatz REFUSE to fix the document? If so, why?

Did he attempt to ‘slide it by’ and just hope no one noticed? i.e was it attempt to commit fraud by KNOWINGLY submitting an invalid document and hoping ‘it passed’?

Was there a per-arranged deal to accept the invalid document by the SEC? Did if fall through? Did someone notice?

Did Schatz commit ‘minor fraud’ and let Nancy Pelosi commit the ‘major fraud’ - declaring a non-natural born Citizen as Constitutionally eligible?

We know that his document was legally worthless. Hence, Ms. Pelosi had to submit the updated letter from the national party since Hawaii law indicates they will accept the OCON from either the state or National party with the required constitutional language.

Every Secretary of State who signed off on Obama should wonder - did Brian Schatz leave us exposed? He did not sign off - why should we?


41 posted on 12/27/2012 6:39:03 PM PST by bluecat6 ("All non-denial denials. They doubt our ancestry, but they don't say the story isn't accurate. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson