Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lurk
It is the exchange of freedom for safety.

It wouldn't improve safety a whit.

It's the exchange for freedom for the Leftist agenda of control.

15 posted on 12/21/2012 7:04:36 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

if not having guns makes eveyone safer, disarm the police, the secret service, and the military. make government live under the same laws.


20 posted on 12/21/2012 7:10:50 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: okie01

Of course.

People reach for the safety as a reflex, not knowing that the loss of freedom is the cost. It’s an impulse purchase.


41 posted on 12/21/2012 9:31:00 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson