Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chris37

CCW would protect against active shooters in schools better than armed guards. You know that. You also know that most jurisdictions cannot afford multiple armed guards. You are like the liberals who think they can wish a perfect world into existence and that unlimited money can make it so. That is confusing money with assets, with value. Learn some economics.


99 posted on 12/22/2012 10:24:05 AM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus

Did I say that the state or the government should pay for it?

No, it should be paid for by the parents in the form of tuition.

In terms of public schools, parents can either decide that their children’s safety trumps a free school and send them private, or they can chance it. If state and federal officials decide that protecting children in schools is more important than wasting money on God knows what else then they can decide that, but they won’t, because they need dead children.

I know economics. I also know that Americans are too lazy, too dumb, too self centered, too arrogant, too entitled to protect what they say is important to them, so they are not going to.

It boils down to what is important to people, and apparently the safety of their children does not rank very high, so see you at the next massacre I suppose.


100 posted on 12/22/2012 10:33:38 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson