Gee, you may as well have said, 'we had this here federal law that violated the US Constitution but that's ok because we did it'.
But in response, See 26, 50 and 66 at your leisure and then feel free to move on because you dont even have the slightest clue that you're the liberal democrat in this argument and I dont know how to get past your jack boot. No, you dont believe the same things they do, but you certainly agree to their methods and THAT makes the Const just as dead. You're the one that sees no problem violating the consitution to impose your version of America on other people. Do you even get it that 'using the govt to impose your view' on another is not conservative?
But, on the chance that you cant come to grips, please cite how the country is any more suicided than it already was given that several states have already given the nod to let two homos call each other spouse.
Expand upon whatever feable rationalization you come up with to tell me how those homos are picking your pocket or breaking your leg.
Further expand upon that and explain how your progressivism vs liberal progressivism isn't ACTUALLY suiciding this country.
What the hell are you afraid of? Just what is it that scares you so about conservatism?
Lets expand on your fears and phobias for a minute, shall we? Lets say the idiot liberal courts did not rule against DOMA. Lets further theorize that a new Constitutional Amendment was ratified, passed by a majority of states, and enacted as law that defines marriage as one man - one woman.
Why does that scare you? Face it - your entire posting history on this thread has been an attack on conservatism, but especially same sex marriage as a fundamental conservative value. JR has been more than tolerant with you, perhaps based on your 1999 sign up date, but you should have been zotted by now. But you keep sticking that fork in the electric socket - you just ain’t all there.
But back to my question as to why you are afraid of a SoCon majority. Is it because we have seen in the past excesses and abuses by do-gooders and Christians?
So even if we conservatives were to obtain a leadership majority, there would not be a re-enactment of Nazi Germany or whatever your fevered brain might imagine.
Look. What you really need to fear is reality. And the reality is that liberalism and socialism is the key enemy here. Look at the Communist Goals of 1963 and check, check, check, check and check some more of the goals that have been attained. And you DARE infer - on this conservative site - that Socons are the enemy?
You say you want to fix the economic mess we’re in as a nation? I say unless we have real moral leadership, there will be no recovery. Am I wrong? You and the Republican Party think so. But a socially liberal ideology results in an economically liberal idealogy. Am I wrong? Show me one of your socially liberal heroes who is right on economic matters.
You just don’t get it. You ask for evidence that homosexuals are damaging our country? Really? You really deny the social and economic benefits of traditional marriage. I suppose you think the billions of dollars paid annualy to welfare recipients are all to them damn married people who raise healthy happy kids and pay their taxes.
Finally - keep insulting conservatism as being “progressivism”. Keep flapping your lips and exposing the truth of what you believe. Class of ‘99 or no.... I will not miss you when you get the zot.
Gingrich: Conservatives Will Have to Accept Marriage 'Equality'
Newsmax ^ | 12/20/2012 | Stephen Feller
Newt is getting beat up pretty bad by us conservatives. Perhaps you could post a few replies in support of Newt, since you feel gay marriage is not a conservative issue anyway.