Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

-— If there were not divorce, then no custody battles and property disputes, yes?-—

A man and a woman have a baby. The woman runs off with the child. Should the state step in?

If the man refuses to support the woman and child, should the state step in?

The list of potential injustices is endless.


66 posted on 12/10/2012 7:07:50 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
A man and a woman have a baby. The woman runs off with the child. Should the state step in? If the man refuses to support the woman and child, should the state step in? The list of potential injustices is endless.

The only reason the state steps in is because for every dollar of child support exthorted from the non custodial parent they get a matching dollar from the feds.

I say that they should only mediate and make sure that some type of payment is made but not to the child support enforcement who then gets their matching dollar and gives it to the non custodial parent.

Remove the financial rewards and you will see more women trying harder to make things work.

123 posted on 12/11/2012 8:16:56 AM PST by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson