Oh wow. Personal attack.
Yeah, you are in league with them, because you don’t see marriage as an essential part of civic society. You see marriage as a contract between two individuals.
Even Lenin said “Destroy the family and you destroy society”, outlining how leftists would chip away at a strong society. Part of the family is marriage between one man and one woman. It certainly is not a mere “contract”. The Founding Fathers were adamant that religion and private morality (which the family cannot be extricated from) were the pillars upon which the USA had to stand, and without them it would fall.
Your posts to me in this thread have not been exactly civil. I cannot recall reading a more egregious post than #87, so obviously trolling for a volatile response. So spare me your feigned offense.
At least *this* post of yours doesn't seem offensive - probably because your reasoning escapes me. I just don't quite follow the link from "being in league with Islamists" to "don't see traditional marriage as essential...." Care to connect those nonsensical dots?
As a matter of fact, I DO see traditional marriage as an essential part of American (and more generally, Western Judeo-Christian) society. What's more, I didn't even mention it in this thread. I didn't deride traditional marriage and certainly didn't speak up in favor of gay "marriage". But, since you allege otherwise, I challenge you to find and cite this comment of mine which supposedly minimizes marriage to the point of a "contract between two individuals". Take your time, dig though my old posts.
I'll check back tomorrow. Be thorough, now.