Lots more info there at the link. A good read. A must read.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All
Go to Google News and Google “French troops Syria” or “British troops Syria”
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Obama owns Harry Reid, who owns the Senate, so if Obama wants to help the Muslim rebels that is what will happen. He has already been caught running guns to them, got some people killed over it.
Obama is a strategic part of the Muslim Brotherhood.
3 posted on
12/06/2012 3:20:46 PM PST by
Venturer
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Every good Hitler needs a SA. The Muslim Caliphate is the violent fall guy for the New World Order pukes. When they are done terrorizing the people into submission, they will be vaporized in nuclear fires so the NWO pukes can be the hero.
Then they will give their power over to a super leader...
4 posted on
12/06/2012 3:28:44 PM PST by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Installing the mofobros everywhere.
5 posted on
12/06/2012 3:51:03 PM PST by
Gene Eric
(Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
What Putin needs to do is expose Obama’s perfidy in a reverse of the Cuban Missile Crisis. The Russian Ambassador to the UN takes recon photos of ex-Libya arms being unloaded in Turkey. They display photos of CIA personnel teaching New Syrian Army troops how to load, prepare, and fire chemical-tipped weapons in Turkey for deployment in Syria against Syrians. THAT could slam the brakes on World War III that Barry and Hillary are orchestrating.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
If they send the 75,000 military in there to secure the chemical weapons, most of those will return with nerve disorders.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Russian and US talks have failed.
Syria fighting rages as diplomats fail
In Dublin, talks among US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, her Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov and UN peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi failed to make any major decisions.
Brahimi said all three agreed the situation in Syria was "very, very, very bad".
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
It is according to if obama’s side is winning or losing.
12 posted on
12/06/2012 4:50:29 PM PST by
sport
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Look up RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT. We’re going in, but why? Look up THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP. See who is on their board. George Soros. This guy is a genius. He runs several countries while only costing him a few billion dollars. He gets us to do his dirty work by buying a few politicians. Poor Syria. They are the battleground over oil.
13 posted on
12/06/2012 5:18:09 PM PST by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
It is already a fact.The kenyan is running weaponry to the jihadists
16 posted on
12/06/2012 5:59:51 PM PST by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Sometimes I think this entire Sarin gas being mixed by Assad is just an excuse to get us involved. After all the story broke from NBC news.
20 posted on
12/06/2012 9:18:01 PM PST by
Wiggins
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The dangerous powers of the world unite as we sit on asses smoking pot and collecting our government checks.
Welcome to Obamaland 2012. :)
23 posted on
12/07/2012 12:07:35 AM PST by
Tzimisce
(What do you do when every every branch of the government is corrupt and aligned against you?)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Whatever will assist the Muslim Brotherhood and get more of our troops killed, O’Beelzebub is all for it.
26 posted on
12/07/2012 5:51:20 AM PST by
crosshairs
(Hurricane Barry is 1000 times more destructive than Hurricane Sandy.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
So far the Mahdi has played the Syria business pretty cleverly. The US wants to get rid of Iran's only ally in the region for a number of reasons chief among them depriving Syria of a naval replenishment base in the Med. Iran has no real navy but has suddenly decided it is going to build a blue water capability. The US knows the Iranians are going to have some sort of nuclear capability in the near term and nuclear capability plus a blue water navy means developing some sort of asymmetric threat system to use on the US and other infidels (EMP or something like it perhaps). So time to torpedo the Syrian-Iranian axis. The Saudis see things the same way. They are happy to collaborate in rallying the merry men who were shooting at us in iraq a few years ago. Arm them anew and send them off to crusdae against he Alawite heretics. When the Assad regime goes down or compresses into a small corner of Syria and the rest of Syria turns into fragmented chaos the Hezbollah may find themselves between a lot of Sunni with blood in their eye and Israel. At the least the Hezbollah will have to cut a lower profile ant the best they will get the Alawite treatment. A Middle East without Assad, without an Iranian ally and without Hezbollah will be a bit safer a quieter for a while. Of course once Iran gets a nuclear capability all of the Arab states and Turkey will have to have nukes as well and we lknow where that is likely to lead to. But the Mahdi will be out of office by them and it will be someone else problem.
However direct western involvement in Syria is about a hundred times dumber than the US adventure in nation building in Iraq. If BHO signs off on that one he is a lot dumber than I have thought he was.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson