No you cannot.
So far, all you've done is provide a list of rubbish, like securing our borders, and using our effing MILITARY to conduct search & destroy missions in "ghettos and slums."
What's the end game, here, ma'am? When you put down the things that go boom and excite you, and all the people you don't like are either dead or in prison, what does victory in the War on Drugs look like? A world where a jazz musician can no longer find a bud, and more than that, no longer wants to?
Define victory. Don't give us your militaristic fantasies.
Ah. I see you both now want a clear definition on ending the WOD.
And because I can’t give you one, you attack any efforts to fight in the WOD.
You two use the same liberal talking points that ended the term War on Terror. Excuse me, I mean our Overseas Contingency Operations.
And when I repeatedly compare the WOD to the WOT or even the WOM (murder) you ignore that argument, and as a result your logic stands that since the WOD is a failure then so is the WOT or the WOM. We should just quit.
And so we follow your advice and dumb down our definitions and legalize murder. Or terror. Or drugs. What a nightmare you libertarians want for our Country.
“Define Victory”.
OK, so I can’t. Not to your satisfaction anyway. But I sure as hell can define losing the WOD. Or surrendering in the WOD. My many replies on this thread detail many horrific realities if you two ever got your way.