To: Slings and Arrows
Family courts in this country are just completely out of control.
2 posted on
12/04/2012 12:26:58 PM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: FreedomPoster
Does he have to pay them Child Support?
3 posted on
12/04/2012 12:31:45 PM PST by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: FreedomPoster
21 months the baby has bonded with the new parents. He needs to move on, it really is sad, but the damage of taking a little one away from the bonded parents is very devastating... The child´s rights at this time are greater than the sire´s right.
To: FreedomPoster
There is something seriously wrong with a system which doesn't question the ability of one spouse to sign away a piece of community property without written consent of the other. Had the husband done this with, say, the family car, there would be hell to pay.
This is the purpose of redefining marriage to include queers: so children become nothing more than chattel to satisfy the "needs" of adults.
7 posted on
12/04/2012 12:35:57 PM PST by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: FreedomPoster
The family court got it right. The couple knew the father had not consented to the adoption as did the agency. The adoption was concealed from him by his wife and the agency. The court has ordered the child returned to her father.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson