To: Larry R. Johnson
SHARK claimed a single sharp rifle crack rang out, I'm impressed if it was taken out with a single rifle shot. Usually you use a shotgun to take out a flying pest like this.
6 posted on
11/19/2012 1:49:36 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Big Bird is a brood parasite: laid in our nest 43 years ago and we are still feeding him.)
To: KarlInOhio
The wrong thing was shot.
12 posted on
11/19/2012 1:52:28 PM PST by
elkfersupper
( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: KarlInOhio
I’m wit chu.
One of them boys probably standing there with a goose gun telling his buds “I’ve been waiting for this all day.”
Wonder if he used lead-free shot ;)
14 posted on
11/19/2012 1:53:24 PM PST by
West Texas Chuck
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. That should be a convenience store, not a Government Agency.)
To: KarlInOhio
Do you think these people know the difference between the two sounds.
To: KarlInOhio
The pictured damage is
not from rifle fire. Dumb@$$3d libwackos...
Any flying object intruding on my property's airspace within shotgun range is a legitimate target. As is the pilot should he / she / it trespass on my soil...
59 posted on
11/19/2012 3:00:11 PM PST by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
To: KarlInOhio
I *highly* doubt it was a “rifle shot.” That was from the Animal Rights Whacko press release. As a practical matter, I would stick with a shotgun just because it’s a lot safer than putting a slug in a trajectory that could carry for miles.
75 posted on
11/19/2012 4:08:06 PM PST by
Cyber Liberty
(Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
To: KarlInOhio
I'm impressed if it was taken out with a single rifle shot. Usually you use a shotgun to take out a flying pest like this. There are other options...
102 posted on
11/19/2012 7:28:17 PM PST by
GreenLanternCorps
("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Jimmy Carter")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson